Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331C1200B7A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:47:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 31989160ABC; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 79EA4160AB0 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:47:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 26135 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2016 20:47:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 26123 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2016 20:47:17 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 20:47:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E12691A5728 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:47:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.147 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.147 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cwJ9ki2_PvPj for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BAY004-OMC3S18.hotmail.com (bay004-omc3s18.hotmail.com [65.54.190.156]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 105945FAE7 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BAY174-W14 ([65.54.190.189]) by BAY004-OMC3S18.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:47:04 -0700 X-TMN: [qWSdLDF1NMweRxtQlrLc04fivtds5EKF] X-Originating-Email: [csharpdeveloper@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_b6385f6d-babb-44cf-90c0-6849eaafa4a0_" From: Joey Samonte To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Subject: RE: Adding a node to cluster Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:47:04 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <2FC00DD9-CFAD-4035-B0EC-B03FBCCD1045@apache.org> References: <2E84FC26-EFED-44B6-B86C-FD4F798B561A@apache.org> ,<2FC00DD9-CFAD-4035-B0EC-B03FBCCD1045@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2016 20:47:04.0839 (UTC) FILETIME=[A9069970:01D207B6] archived-at: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 20:47:19 -0000 --_b6385f6d-babb-44cf-90c0-6849eaafa4a0_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does this mean that setting up replication is separate from setting up clus= tering?=20 =20 Does replication needs to be bi-directional between nodes? =20 > From: rnewson@apache.org > Subject: Re: Adding a node to cluster > Date: Thu=2C 25 Aug 2016 11:10:45 +0100 > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org >=20 > Ok=2C seems I've confused you.=20 >=20 > Couchdb replication occurs over http or https=2C as you know. The nodes i= n a couchdb 2.0 cluster do not communicate with each other over http. They = use Erlang rpc. Erlang rpc can be configured for TLS encryption. It's in t= he Erlang faq and is fairly simple to set up in newer Erlang releases.=20 >=20 > I feel I owe an example of 2.0 cluster that exclusively uses TLS for all = communications.=20 >=20 > Sent from my iPhone >=20 > > On 24 Aug 2016=2C at 20:47=2C Joey Samonte wrote: > >=20 > > What if we remove the reverse proxy and just set up the CouchDB nodes t= o allow only SSL connections=2C port 6984? https://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/= How_to_enable_SSL > >=20 > >> Subject: Re: Adding a node to cluster > >> From: rnewson@apache.org > >> Date: Wed=2C 24 Aug 2016 19:43:51 +0100 > >> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org > >>=20 > >> Assuming you mean a 2.0 cluster=2C no=2C all those nodes need to be ab= le to communicate with erlang rpc (service discovery over port 4369 and the= n whatever port the node is running ong). > >>=20 > >>> On 24 Aug 2016=2C at 12:36=2C Joey Samonte wrote: > >>>=20 > >>> Good day=2C > >>>=20 > >>> Is it possible to add a node to a cluster from Fauxton if the remote = host is behind a reverse proxy (nginx) configured as HTTPS? > >>>=20 > >>> Regards=2C > >>> Joey > > =20 >=20 = --_b6385f6d-babb-44cf-90c0-6849eaafa4a0_--