Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE57D200B8E for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 22:39:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id AD058160ACA; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id F3077160AC8 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 22:39:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 33959 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2016 20:39:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 33923 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2016 20:39:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:39:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 671CBC7153 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:39:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hm1SusfWq4kV for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net (smtp.justsomehost.net [204.11.51.157]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9DF355FCFA for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B353A562CC8 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:37:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.justsomehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id wBLIbwsV1-Hi for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:37:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5C5562D58 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:37:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.justsomehost.net Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.justsomehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id N2HGY8ypLITa for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:37:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net (smtp.justsomehost.net [204.11.51.157]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB43562CC8 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:37:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:37:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Joan Touzet Reply-To: Joan Touzet To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Message-ID: <13742701.592.1474922354782.JavaMail.Joan@RITA> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Rebar 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [204.11.51.157] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1194 (Zimbra Desktop/7.2.8_12101_Windows) Thread-Topic: Rebar 3 Thread-Index: ptZw3zgB4aehCVFeLnUrvQ3seuu05g== archived-at: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:39:36 -0000 I'd like to see us move to Rebar 3 as well. Challenges will be compiling the NIF stuff, especially in a cross-platform stable way. GitHub notifications tells me davisp started in on a little thing: https://github.com/davisp/erlang-native-compiler Perhaps you can make use of this / talk to Paul about it and get things moving? I will sign up to help test on Windows once you've got *nix builds working correctly. -Joan ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Kowalski" > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 12:31:02 PM > Subject: Rebar 3 > > Hey, > > I would like to make it possible to write Elixir for CouchDB > extensions. > > Right now we are using rebar 2 to compile our Erlang and C code. > There > is a plugin for rebar to compile Elixir: > https://github.com/yrashk/rebar_elixir_plugin which is not maintained > any more. I have compiled Elixir for CouchDB, but it is an aweful > hack > as the plugin was written for Elixir 0.9 > > This is the main reason why I would like to switch CouchDB to rebar > 3. > > rebar 3 seems to be the way to build / manage Erlang deps right now > and if nothing speaks against it, I just continue to work on the > topic. > > > Best, > Robert >