couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.0.0-rc.1
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:12:02 GMT
Does anyone confirm these issues for voted candidate?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-3145
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-3146

IIRC there are few else issues about invalid escaping and error
handling in backlog.

--
,,,^..^,,,


On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Robert Samuel Newson
<rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
> OSX 10.11.6, erlang 18.
>
> sig is valid, checksums too.
>
> make check passed (except the two known flaky compaction daemon tests)
>
> I dev/run'ed and tried the basics (db creation, doc creation, view creation) all seems
in order.
>
> +1
>
> B.
>
>> On 13 Sep 2016, at 08:13, Johannes J. Schmidt <schmidt@netzmerk.com> wrote:
>>
>> Am Dienstag, den 13.09.2016, 07:29 +0200 schrieb Jan Lehnardt:
>>>>
>>>> On 12 Sep 2016, at 22:32, Johannes J. Schmidt <schmidt@netzmerk.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> *Check:* gpg, md5, sha1 all good
>>>> (I also checked sha256 because it was present at https://dist.apach
>>>> e.or
>>>> g/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/2.0.0/rc.1/ but this did not work:
>>>> sha256sum: apache-couchdb-2.0.0.tar.gz.sha256: keine korrekt
>>>> formatierte SHA256‐Prüfsummenzeile gefunden)
>>>>
>>>> *Build:* ./configure and make all fine
>>>> *Run:* ./dev/run without a problem
>>>>
>>>> *Fauxton:* works
>>>> *Verify Installation:* passes
>>>>
>>>> *Info:* all fine but with one difference: there is no `uuid`:
>>>> {"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"2.0.0","vendor":{"name":"The Apache
>>>> Software Foundation"}}
>>>> Prior (1.6.1):
>>>> {"couchdb":"Welcome","uuid":"99269f05152a3c15e9eaba13c8cf9124","ver
>>>> sion
>>>> ":"1.6.1","vendor":{"name":"The Apache Software
>>>> Foundation","version":"1.6.1"}}
>>>> (Since we are depending on it atm - is the server uuid still
>>>> accessible
>>>> somewhere else?)
>>>>
>>>> *Replication:* single shot pull replication works like a charm with
>>>> semi large dataset (50.000 docs) some including attachments (one
>>>> per
>>>> doc, about 50k)
>>>>
>>>> *make check:* passes all test, except JavaScript tests: "HTTP API
>>>> was
>>>> disabled at compile time.”
>>>
>>> you can enable this with `./configure -c && make`
>>
>> Thanks! Now all tests run an pass.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Docs offline (via Fauxton link):* http://127.0.0.1:15984/_utils/do
>>>> cs/c
>>>> ontents.html Not found.
>>>>
>>>> 4.7.2-1-ARCH
>>>>
>>>> I don't think make check is release relevant, hence my +1 vote.
>>>> Offline
>>>> docs would be great but the somewhat broken link is also not a
>>>> showstopper imo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am Montag, den 12.09.2016, 15:53 +0200 schrieb Jan Lehnardt:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to call a vote Apache CouchDB 2.0.0-rc.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these
>>>>> release
>>>>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>>>>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
>>>>> stuck in!
>>>>>
>>>>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>>>>>
>>>>>     wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/2.
>>>>> 0.0/
>>>>> rc.1/apache-couchdb-2.0.0.tar.gz
>>>>>     wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/2.
>>>>> 0.0/
>>>>> rc.1/apache-couchdb-2.0.0.tar.gz.asc
>>>>>     wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/2.
>>>>> 0.0/
>>>>> rc.1/apache-couchdb-2.0.0.tar.gz.tar.gz.md5
>>>>>     wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/2.
>>>>> 0.0/
>>>>> rc.1/apache-couchdb-2.0.0.tar.gz.tar.gz.sha
>>>>>
>>>>> Please follow the test procedure here:
>>>>>
>>>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BtndYr-0KDQTqBSLVdJoR_8C5
>>>>> ObYj
>>>>> T1RBo_Qyh5ykdQ/edit
>>>>>
>>>>> Please remember that “rc.1” is an annotation. If the vote passes,
>>>>> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 2.0.0. If we
>>>>> are
>>>>> restarting the vote, we’ll get “rc.2”, “rc.3” etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please also note, since this is the first vote on 2.0.0, we’re
>>>>> leaving the vote open for a full five days instead of the usual
>>>>> 3.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you find *anything* out of the ordinary, please let us know
>>>>> asap.
>>>>> Doing votes is cheap, but we have to make sure that this is a
>>>>> good
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is some background info on what it means to do an Apache
>>>>> Release: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone on this list has a vote and every vote counts!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please cast your votes now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jan
>>>>> --
>

Mime
View raw message