Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD37200B5E for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:37:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BE626160A93; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 13E4D160A90 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:37:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 38143 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2016 07:37:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 38132 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2016 07:37:32 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:37:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C195ECE4DD for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:37:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.001 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TznXqwFhjz38 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from monoceres.uberspace.de (monoceres.uberspace.de [95.143.172.184]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1CCE95F39A for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20268 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2016 07:37:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO rose.speedport?w?921v?1?39?000) (127.0.0.1) by monoceres.uberspace.de with SMTP; 10 Aug 2016 07:37:28 -0000 From: Jan Lehnardt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Getting libraries to test RCs Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:37:28 +0200 To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org Developers" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) archived-at: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:37:33 -0000 Hey everyone, from Joan=E2=80=99s excellent blog post about testing Release = Candidates: > To our valued CouchDB application and library developers: please, = please run your software against each of the options below. =E2=80=94 https://blog.couchdb.org/2016/08/08/release-candidates/ I think we can be a little more proactive about this for CouchDB client = libraries: let=E2=80=99s open issues on all the CouchDB-compatible = client software we care about to test an RC. Since there are a lot of projects, and we don=E2=80=99t necessarily know = which one we =E2=80=9Ccare=E2=80=9D about, we should try to be clever = about it. Maybe something like this can work: 1. We prepare an issue text explaining the thing: Heya, CouchDB team = here, major new version coming up, you should test it like so: