Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781F5200B14 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 09:57:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 76B57160A4E; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 07:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C01EF160A26 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 09:57:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 6720 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2016 07:57:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 6709 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2016 07:57:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 07:57:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EE56B18050F for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 07:57:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tYgq1IDO7EgM for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 07:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net (smtp.justsomehost.net [204.11.51.157]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6F5375F368 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 07:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957A7562CDE for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:56:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.justsomehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id hEu-gX6sY7jX for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:56:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E1D562CDF for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:56:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.justsomehost.net Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.justsomehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id hx9KWHuKDuaW for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net (smtp.justsomehost.net [204.11.51.157]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D610F562CDE for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:56:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Joan Touzet Reply-To: Joan Touzet To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Message-ID: <11238402.14.1466236619403.JavaMail.Joan@RITA> In-Reply-To: References: <487167227.99.1466196508652.JavaMail.Joan@Brain> <14869213.109.1466199294857.JavaMail.Joan@Brain> <1578305305.136.1466206475985.JavaMail.Joan@Brain> Subject: Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [204.11.51.157] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1194 (Zimbra Desktop/7.2.7_12059_Windows) Thread-Topic: 2.0 & Windows: status update Thread-Index: QgYZx9GiLoszlNOiqsZK5t5VvksmSA== archived-at: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 07:57:08 -0000 Replying off list. Nick be sure you get my patch to the couchdb repo itself before you test: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/423/files I'll be reworking this slightly to make Ilya happy but the PR works in its current state. -Joan ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nick North" > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" > Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 3:37:50 AM > Subject: Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update > > Hi Joan. This sounds like an improvement on my last Windows build > attempt, > which still had a couple of eunit failures outside the os_process > area. > I'll attempt to reproduce your results today, and report back. > > Nick > > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 at 00:34 Joan Touzet wrote: > > > Replying to my own email: dev/run is using the wrong path slashes > > for > > the path to the javascript/coffeescript view servers. I've > > submitted a PR > > and will merge if no one complains. > > > > Here is the latest set of test results if anyone still wants to > > volunteer > > to help me review them (both Eunit and JS, scroll down for the JS > > results): > > > > https://gist.github.com/wohali/256d134dea8e79c2050636c7ff044c23 > > > > I'm especially worried about the few JS tests we're failing, those > > seem > > subtle. I need a Linux baseline to compare against. If no one has > > one, I > > can see I'll be setting up my own Linux build environment on > > Monday... > > > > -Joan > > >