Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3C32FF09-AADC-4D0B-B097-B1368224BCD2@apache.org>
References: <56A4B4D9.7050502@tu-dortmund.de>
	<CAJ1bcfE_JLmvYgZPa=dmuFxwJsCQ4xCxC_hii1Jn8LV1-8fKVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5BB6670D-CD28-492D-B267-959556BE8413@apache.org>
	<56A62D28.80707@tu-dortmund.de>
	<CAHdjipLyHy4HWdGYv1=hmzv5VNZ5awCQB6uNGZz_Ee_rT7q4Og@mail.gmail.com>
	<3C32FF09-AADC-4D0B-B097-B1368224BCD2@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:57:27 +0300
Message-ID: 
 <CAHdjipL4uXY0L74avTQZ-_sOZLwJm8CZm0H47EPHBLs+rjH-_g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Documentation for CI
From: Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com>
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>> Why did you think that idea to keep CI documentation in the couchdb-ci
>> repository is bad?
>>
>> - couchdb-documentation is the place for project documentation. CI
>> could be described there from the point how to setup own build system.
>> That has a sense for me.
>
> I=E2=80=99d like to see our docs expanded to not just describing CouchDB =
the
> software, but the whole project, including how everything works, how
> CouchDB works internally, the whole shebang. Kinda like FreeBSD has
> everything in top-level books, just that we don=E2=80=99t need to split t=
his
> up yet, and can get away with different sections of the same =E2=80=9Cdoc=
ument=E2=80=9D.

All my 4 paws are up for this. Previous conception was different.

--
,,,^..^,,,