couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Johs Ensby <j...@b2w.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:37:58 GMT
Thanks for this Andy,

I can contribute to the discussion of the feature seen from a user perspective.
Would it be appropriate to present some use cases?

best
Johs

> On 1. okt. 2015, at 12.33, Andy Wenk <andywenk@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Johs,
> 
> Let me please show the steps needed.
> 
> * discuss the feature very clearly on the dev@. Please make sure that core
> developers as committers with commit bits are involved
> 
> * code the feature. Make sure to implement tests
> 
> * send a pull request and show it to dev@
> 
> * finally the community will accept or decline the feature (this will
> involve refactoring and changes)
> 
> As Alex said. The PMC or Jan do not decide about the feature.
> 
> All the best
> 
> Andy
> On 1 Oct 2015 11:21, "Alexander Shorin" <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Johs Ensby <johs@b2w.com> wrote:
>>> will you welcome ermouths rewrite contribution?
>> 
>> The decision is depends on the implementation. If it will be good, why
>> not? Finally, CouchDB is open source project: we cannot forbid people
>> right for contributions, we only welcome them.
>> 
>>> Arguments against couchapps has to do with performance and the folly in
>> competing with node.js.
>> 
>> Performance question for the new _rewrite implementation is very
>> depends on query server. Once it can process this kind of functions,
>> you may use something better than JS to gain better performance. That
>> could be Erlang native query server, or luerl-based one, or else you
>> like.
>> 
>> --
>> ,,,^..^,,,
>> 


Mime
View raw message