couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Kowalski <...@kowalski.gd>
Subject Re: Let's cut a Nano release
Date Fri, 04 Sep 2015 19:09:33 GMT
Hi Nuno,

thanks for offering your help!

I don't think we wait for something from you, we are just trying to
somehow get the repo transferred to the ASF so we can retain the
issues. One thing we have to get working on the ASF side for it is to
enable GitHub issues for the repo which are disabled by default. I
know Infra at least plans to support GitHub issues once GitHub
released their new permissions API.

Once we figured out the nitty gritty details with infra we'll ping
you, but until then don't worry! :)


On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Nuno Job <nunojobpinto@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys, to make sure are you waiting on any action on my behalf?
>
>
>
>
> Happy to do whatever apache seems fit, a single official email from apache and I’ll
get it done,
>
>
>
>
> Take care,
>
> Nuno
>
>
> —
> Sent from Mailbox
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Robert Kowalski <rok@kowalski.gd> wrote:
>
>> Somehow I got no answer on the ML - I opened a Jira ticket:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-10252
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Johannes Jörg Schmidt
>> <schmidt@netzmerk.com> wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am in favor of a repo transfer because
>>>
>>> - - the redirect
>>> - - issues and issue history
>>> - - pull requests (there are two currently open where I do not have any
>>> opinion, sorry!)
>>> - - startgazers
>>> - - wiki
>>>
>>> If that would be possible in any way it would be awesome.
>>>
>>> :) Johannes
>>>
>>> On 12.08.2015 03:38, Robert Kowalski wrote:
>>>> i think infra could just accept the repo once there is a
>>>> possibility in having github issues for asf projects
>>>>
>>>> i have transferred a lot of repos (but not with the asf). the cool
>>>> thing is that you get a redirect for free, keep all your previous
>>>> issues, wikis, PRs etc...
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Jason Smith
>>>> <jason.h.smith@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Right, good point, Alexander.
>>>>>
>>>>> In that case, I would say, let's not do an actual GitHub
>>>>> "transfer." There are only a few tickets. I think we could move
>>>>> the key ones over by hand ourselves; and in the fullness of time,
>>>>> it won't much matter.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Robert Kowalski
>>>>> <rok@kowalski.gd> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Alexander Shorin
>>>>>> <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Robert Kowalski
>>>>>>> <rok@kowalski.gd>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 3. Can you chime in at [1] ? Can you open the link? I
>>>>>>>> basically asked
>>>>>>> infra
>>>>>>>> if we can have Github issues enabled in all our subprojects
>>>>>>>> and if
>>>>> they
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> migrate nano for us together with issues, wiki,
>>>>>>>> closed/open/prs etc.
>>>>> If
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> can not open the link, please ping me!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's only possible if you'll transfer original GH nano
>>>>>>> repository to Apache GH account. This also means that current
>>>>>>> couchdb-nano have to be removed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- ,,,^..^,,,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v2
>>>
>>> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV0e78AAoJED+W7gN+c0gcHLsH/2kii63zT8IWA/a90OS1WGKI
>>> 1mCic03mVeU6grm5C3lGpgx22Y+RyyPjB9VH6sCvqGwjeb5DeooLAp0iLsR2V8OZ
>>> bML/Ptr3bUsf5LzmnEAnDKOTOlmQRCwQj3FOhWwmMjLPXK3zcZPqE0Xs1px3w/Mr
>>> lyjy7nfQb53SuOq4u70C1BpllvDnwFrQntbxkVam9d4OD66Dh+J1cMNPWhidIZWr
>>> pKWkv8np9cpf52DaFORSLyQd5i/mXpfIAL/CRA5DzYoKcCm/lEGkuZDr2a6cSbGy
>>> T3KRLU4m3EMDCb7kuquLz1+gTe1+zpVXtpThobfCUdaTTtnidyd/zIclLBSZx1g=
>>> =WWJd
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message