couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function
Date Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:23:21 GMT
Performance is likely to be very poor but I'm not blocking it.

I do suggest we look at Lua though. There's a native Erlang lua interpreter written by Robert
Virding. Lua seems a popular choice in this space, haproxy 1.6 has lua hooks. 

> On 29 Sep 2015, at 06:06, ermouth <ermouth@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Jason,
> 
> thought about your message more systematically.
> 
> We have a distinct tradeoff (JS-provided flexibility vs performance), it
> exists from the beginning of CouchDB. Now, with cluster, we have chance to
> reduce JS-related impact.
> 
> For prev versions I can hardly imagine more than, say, 1K simultaneous
> highly active users per single instance, when JS is actively used. JS just
> stalls on validates, updates an so on. And if we dared to have lists
> (especially in awful ACL workarounds), 1K turned to 100-300, even for thick
> i7.
> 
> To increase number of users, to scale, I had to have smth in front of (N *
> CouchDB). And that ‘smth’ is always quite complex. Moreover, it is always
> task-specific, non-general.
> 
> With cluster, the problem goes solved in general, and no additional ‘smth’
> in front of CouchDB needed. Got 1001-th user? Add one more node, that‘s
> all. We already have this problem nearly solved, by cluster nature.
> 
> So why not to extend – dramatically – CouchDB playground? Shared DBs out of
> the box is badly desired option, as I see.
> 
> And it‘s a very cheap way to make ALL couchappers happy for a long time )
> 
> BR
> 
> ermouth

Mime
View raw message