Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD22918FFD for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82017 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2015 07:46:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 81952 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2015 07:46:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 81941 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2015 07:46:50 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:46:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 947B21A6F1E for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:46:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LucMPY9WJNs6 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net (smtp.justsomehost.net [204.11.51.157]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A856220EFB for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D488E297F for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:46:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jsent.ca Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.justsomehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KdlaNip3gnVy for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:46:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net (smtp.justsomehost.net [204.11.51.157]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3791A5BDC6 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:46:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:46:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Joan Touzet Reply-To: Joan Touzet To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Message-ID: <25981455.378.1436859989966.JavaMail.Joan@RITA> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Windows PR #2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [204.11.51.157] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.7_GA_2942 (Zimbra Desktop/7.2.7_12052_Windows) And letting people know I'll validate this Wednesday, I am unavailable Tuesday. Thanks Paul! -Joan ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Davis" > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 2:43:13 AM > Subject: Re: Windows PR #2 > > Just a note on this thread that there's a PR open for the khash > issue. > > https://github.com/apache/couchdb-khash/pull/3 > > Yay. Now bedtime. > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Joan Touzet > wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Dave Cottlehuber" > >> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org > >> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 4:19:58 PM > >> Subject: Re: Windows PR #2 > >> > >> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, at 09:56 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > >> > I intend to publish it in detail once we have the khash issue > >> > sorted out, but in short: > >> > > >> > Windows 7 VM > >> > MSVC 2013 Community Edition > >> > Erlang 17.5 (didn't want to jump right to 18.x yet) > >> > Latest Mozilla build chain (for Spidermonkey only) > >> > ICU latest, binary download only > >> > > >> > For Spidermonkey, I have a minor source tree tweak that allows > >> > this build chain to work correctly a) without your crazy > >> > setup in glazier and b) against MSVC 2013 which was not > >> > out when 1.8.5 was released. I also build it 64-bit, but > >> > haven't been able to test it yet (because of khash). > >> > >> re (a), nice! Not needing the extra shell malarkey is a big help. > >> One less toolchain :D > >> > >> I have tried in the past just unpacking the pre-compiled official > >> erlang release and putting it in the right place beside the source > >> tarball, which also worked but I'm a little nervous about whether > >> that is a legitimate approach or not. That could get us down to > >> just erlang + MSVC which would be a huge step forwards in > >> simplicity. > > > > Oh, I wasn't building Erlang either, I was using the official > > binary > > downloads. The only thing I was building was SM1.8.5. So yup, we're > > in good shape. > > > > I just need help with the khash changes proposed by Paul, I'm at a > > loss as to where to start. > > > > -Joan >