Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5ACB17DBA for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 14:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5712 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2015 14:14:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 5635 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2015 14:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 5624 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2015 14:14:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 14:14:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rok@kowalski.gd designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 14:14:39 +0000 Received: by wiaa2 with SMTP id a2so91857989wia.0 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QlGM2pPqh/PA+R9UcuAoU9cRcn1dm44sdfDLg7nCxJU=; b=IdMjX5jGRzlV/RJBg6cB+NM7zGMMLdaMi49lXdKEDFo4TFpkhTbIYbbLjD32bifp+x 7xO28HEPlWW/WJsScz+P54/0kwhudRfTMAnElajg9V58sFqrZiebG6el6G374HWj8YO2 6hu9YyvsNjfCNp/QD7++fRzBlg5zzV4IGrg13zpDmZiJznWPtZzO+jZtrztl73Dbv1NX 1akHk5JiV098yBEhsaZvl9/cJsLroA2l07MJG8k6IzGRfcMcHxpdSmxY38T6s3GaLy0h R5Euob/Pit6w+Q7uqTYuKMqAAqe3wH1wmfeBw0GEONWYLnoYFYBccIWHLHRQMSgZ1yn3 Aaug== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbOZmQTN7wyWzvGMU1iYqI4YsOBPnKoaNU4Y9kjo84MQrA/Fn3dH46FuIaev+Gx/dbHtHE MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.202.228 with SMTP id kl4mr13369766wic.66.1427638367803; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rok@kowalski.gd Received: by 10.28.46.142 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2a02:2028:50f:1801:35af:cc77:f4ed:7403] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:12:47 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: AyvuA-z4kzHF_iqMGmFoOppJhNQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fauxton style differences in different web browsers. From: Robert Kowalski To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Dulanga, you are perfectly right! We even have a new standardized component [1] for buttons in the header, but they are not used there yet. Currently they are used in the headerbar where you can select all elements etc. [1] https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/blob/master/app/addons/components/react-components.react.jsx#L23 On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Dulanga Sashika wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried to fix COUCHDB-2544 > bug in fauxton and I > noticed that there is a style difference in Google Chorme [1] and Firefox > [2] browsers. Please see the alignment of "Add New Database" and "API URL" > in both images. I found that there are some differences in some elements > specially like "line-height" from the web. I think there should be a > normalization mechanism for styles. > > Please suggest a solution for this problem. > > [1] - https://www.dropbox.com/s/h3qb21cl0qnntip/chrome_view.png?dl=0 > [2] - https://www.dropbox.com/s/n1avew8z9qjj3tz/firefox_view.png?dl=0 > > Thank You > > W. A. Dulanga Sashika, > Undergraduate Student, > Department of Computer Science and Engineering, > University of Moratuwa.