couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Move transactional email out of dev@
Date Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:59:35 GMT
Oh, and -1 on disabling our GitHub email integration

Justification: it would break the "decisions are made on the mailing lists" rule

On 16 March 2015 at 16:58, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for JIRA -> issues@
>
> -1 for GitHub PRs -> commits@
>
>> Justification: PR comments are dev discussion, not changesets
>
> I am +0 for GitHub PRs remaining on dev
>
>> Justification: I also get that they're noisy
>
> I am +1 for GitHub PRs moving to something like reviews@
>
> On 16 March 2015 at 15:42, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Robert Kowalski <rok@kowalski.gd> wrote:
>>> Alex: I think people who are not interested in reviewing PRs now will
>>> not be interested anyway, no matter which channels we try to enforce.
>>> We are currently channeling all mails for PRs to dev and since months
>>> I am getting reviews from the same group of persons.
>>
>> Indeed, but those who are shouldn't suffer from the spam which happens
>> in commits@ . Please note, the GH notifications aren't just
>> automatically generated emails: you can reply on them and those
>> replied will be synced with GH. So you're able to lead a discussion
>> right from your email client.
>>
>> The most compromise solution looks for me as a separate ML. We
>> collection the stats for every board report. If it won't be much
>> popular/useful we'll just shut it down and move these stuff to
>> commits@, but with really insurance that nobody cares/use ML for GH
>> conversations.
>>
>> What's the reviews are constantly made by the same group of persons is
>> a separate issue.
>>
>> --
>> ,,,^..^,,,
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater



-- 
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater

Mime
View raw message