couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andy Wenk <andyw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Import docker-couchdb (Was: [DISCUSSION] Import docker-couchdb)
Date Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:44:47 GMT
+1

On 11 March 2015 at 20:19, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 05 Mar 2015, at 18:49, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> between https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/305 and
> https://github.com/klaemo/docker-couchdb/issues/22 I was wondering
> whether the docker-couchdb project would be up for donating their effort to
> us and to take over maintenance. @klaemo is up for it and we are only
> waiting for the one other significant contributor to give their OK.
> >>
> >> With that out of the way: do we want this?
> >>
> >> Docker can be used in two capacities for CouchDB:
> >>
> >> 1. spin up a dev environment with all dependencies quickly.
> >> 2. spin up a production instance of CouchDB that is all self-contained.
> >>
> >> Our current Dockerfile serves 1., but is poorly maintained, and
> klaemo/docker-couchdb serves 2, and @klaemo hinted at being interested in
> taking over maintenance of 2.
> >>
> >> I’d be in favour of having some Docker experience in-house that can
> maintain both use-cases and cross-share any developments.
> >>
> >> If I hear no objections here, I’ll move to a vote.
> >
> > Thanks everyone for your input!
> >
> > Let’s go to a formal vote:
> >
> > Do we want to import the docker-couchdb project?
> >
> > I am +1.
> >
> > Best
> > Jan
> > --
> >
> >
>



-- 
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!

GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588

 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message