couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joan Touzet <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Move transactional email out of dev@
Date Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:46:44 GMT
I agree with all of this.

I'd be in support of an automated email monthly to dev@ that reminds
people where to go to look for GH PRs, JIRA ticket updates, etc.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Noah Slater" <>
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:58:35 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Move transactional email out of dev@

+1 for JIRA -> issues@

-1 for GitHub PRs -> commits@

> Justification: PR comments are dev discussion, not changesets

I am +0 for GitHub PRs remaining on dev

> Justification: I also get that they're noisy

I am +1 for GitHub PRs moving to something like reviews@

On 16 March 2015 at 15:42, Alexander Shorin <> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Robert Kowalski <> wrote:
>> Alex: I think people who are not interested in reviewing PRs now will
>> not be interested anyway, no matter which channels we try to enforce.
>> We are currently channeling all mails for PRs to dev and since months
>> I am getting reviews from the same group of persons.
> Indeed, but those who are shouldn't suffer from the spam which happens
> in commits@ . Please note, the GH notifications aren't just
> automatically generated emails: you can reply on them and those
> replied will be synced with GH. So you're able to lead a discussion
> right from your email client.
> The most compromise solution looks for me as a separate ML. We
> collection the stats for every board report. If it won't be much
> popular/useful we'll just shut it down and move these stuff to
> commits@, but with really insurance that nobody cares/use ML for GH
> conversations.
> What's the reviews are constantly made by the same group of persons is
> a separate issue.
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,

Noah Slater

View raw message