couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Keizer <rob...@keizer.ca>
Subject Re: Nano and Futon CLI
Date Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:20:17 GMT
I use nano and CouchDB every day, both for work and personal projects.

I would love to see nano become part of the ASF under the CouchDB flag.
I think standardizing libraries for various languages would be a great
benefit to CouchDB itself.

Just my two cents as a developer / sysadmin using both.


On 2015-01-22 5:03 AM, Nuno Job wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Responses inline:
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> - Why do you want to contribute these projects?
>>
> The main motivation is just to help CouchDB. When I started these projects
> they were an hobby. These days there's enough use in nano's part to justify
> a closer, more organized attention. My lack of commitment to the project is
> not helping.
>
> Personal reasons: None.
>
>
>
>
>> - What's your expectation on their life under CouchDB flag?
>>
> None, anything is better than current. Just trying to help, but as for the
> whole project I have no stakes in it. I love couchdb as a user, and I think
> it will continue this way.
>
>
>
>> - How your contribution will improve CouchDB user experience?
>>
> I believe having a standard way to connect to CouchDB would be extremely
> beneficial: WE have came far enough that the requirements are well
> understood and libraries that have been around for a while include most
> fixes that companies use in production. The second reason is progress:
>
> (1) nano could natively support multiple versions of couch by defining the
> version of the compatible api you want to connect
> (2) nano could easily support extensions for apis like cloudant
> (3) nano could easily support the browser
>
> however this requires effort and dedication to maintence. Both things I
> can't do in my free time and the project would be much more suited to do.
>
> As for futoncli, it just seems like a nice feature to deliver for folks
> that use couch. It's pretty complete and has `raw` mode, hence people can
> even script with it. If it was delivered by default, people could easily
> create easier shell scripts with couch on any installation.
>
>
>> - Don't your fear that this will hurt them? ASF has more strict rules
>> on contributions and commit bits and also in CouchDB team there are
>> not much nano/futoncli active contributors (anyone?) to continue their
>> maintaining.
>>
> It's a valid point, but I'm completely out of it and I have no opinion. To
> the best of my knowledge no contributor of nano is a apache member.
>



Mime
View raw message