couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexander Shorin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1218) Better logger performance
Date Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:21:33 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14214050#comment-14214050
] 

Alexander Shorin commented on COUCHDB-1218:
-------------------------------------------

[~rnewson] it's a pity that it breaks log rotation. Are you fill ok to close it as fixed by
claiming lager to provide better logging performance?

> Better logger performance
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-1218
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1218
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Filipe Manana
>            Assignee: Filipe Manana
>         Attachments: 0001-Better-logger-performance.patch
>
>
> I made some experiments with OTP's disk_log module (available since 2001 at least) to
use it to manage the log file.
> It turns out I got better throughput by using it. Basically it adopts a strategy similar
to the asynchronous couch_file Damien described in this thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3C5C39FB5A-0ACA-4FF9-BD90-2EBECF271850@apache.org%3E
> Here's a benchmark with relaximation, 50 writers, 100 readers, documents of 1Kb, delayed_commits
set to false and 'info' log level (default):
> http://graphs.mikeal.couchone.com/#/graph/9e19f6d9eeb318c70cabcf67bc013c7f
> The reads got a better throughput (bottom graph, easier to visualize).
> The patch (also attached here), which has a descriptive comment, is at:
> https://github.com/fdmanana/couchdb/compare/logger_perf.patch



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message