couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felipe Mafra <felipe.ma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: attn: listmaster - list issue
Date Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:17:22 GMT
Miles,

RFCs are these:

http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc6532.html
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc5322.html

But I'd like you to know that I am not seeing any duplicated field
*reply-to* in message header I received.



Felipe Mafra
felipe.mafra@gmail.com

2014-11-11 15:22 GMT-02:00 Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>:

> Ok.  As to whether others have problem - it really does depend on what
> there antispam/antivirus setup looks like.
>
> A little googling tells me that the standard Amavis antivirus considers
> multiple reply-to: lines as a "bad header" signature, and the standard
> configuration quarantines messages with bad headers.
>
> The work around, for me, is obviously to play with the antivirus
> configuration - but I think that Amavis only goes to the granularity of
> quarantining all or none of the various BAD HEADER checks it performs.
> Need to to a little research. I'm not sure I want to turn all of those off.
>
> I need to do some more research as to what is the RFC-compliant handling
> of reply-to: headers by mail forwarders, if there is indeed any such spec.
> It's pretty obvious that most list handlers and other forwarders either
> delete them or rewrite them to things like original-reply-to: (the issues I
> found by googling were mostly about things that broke when a piece of
> software, e.g., a particular Drupal release, started sending messages with
> duplicate reply-to: headers).
>
> Since this is a new behavior (unless I just wasn't noticing all that stuff
> going straight to trash), I wonder if apache.org has changed or updated
> its list or mail infrastructure.  What does this list run on top of?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Miles Fidelman
>
>
>
>
> Andy Wenk wrote:
>
>> I am a moderator of this list and I am not aware that listmaster is known.
>> So if there are any issues it's ok to just write it here and a moderator
>> will take care if needed. And yes infra is short for infrastructure.
>>
>> Let's see if others do have the same issue with this list. If yes I will
>> take action :)
>> On Nov 11, 2014 5:18 PM, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Well, I cc'd listmaster and postmaster - or are there other contacts to
>>> use?  And what does INFRA stand for (infrastructure?).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Miles
>>>
>>> Andy Wenk wrote:
>>>
>>>  The cool folks from apache who take care of everything related to the
>>>> infrastructure of all the apache projects and of the ASF itself  :). In
>>>> this case also the mailing lists ... Aka sysadmins ;-)
>>>> On Nov 11, 2014 5:00 PM, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Umm... who or what is INFRA?
>>>>
>>>>> Andy Wenk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I personally don't have this problem. But if others are faced with
>>>>>> this, I
>>>>>> will report it to INFRA .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>> On Nov 11, 2014 3:17 PM, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Recently, I've been finding a lot of coucdb related email traffic
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> my
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  spam folder. I think it's just the dev list, but I'm not 100% sure
of
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> (I seem to recall this for other traffic, but intermittently,
and the
>>>>>>> latest batch is fine).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     On examination, I find that our local antivirus/antispam
setup is
>>>>>>> reporting this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> X-Amavis-Alert:  BAD HEADER SECTION Duplicate header field:
>>>>>>> "Reply-To"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is anybody else seeing this.  If yes, is perhaps the list software
>>>>>>> misconfigured, perhaps following a patch to address DMARC breakage?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Miles Fidelman
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message