Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E129117E6 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93165 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2014 16:04:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 93099 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2014 16:04:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 93086 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2014 16:04:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:04:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dch@jsonified.com designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.111.4.27] (HELO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:04:28 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id A509F2139B for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 12:04:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 20 Jul 2014 12:04:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jsonified.com; h= date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=w69fIN0n2pB8bv5ByzC8khM RNzU=; b=hASY6RE5eg/H5KKoggqWU142WRhQVzArsLOTxz3Tiupgo1GxIE8ESyP vNGdH8NQFFSGty2+sYw7hnoQ5yAcisXTG+CXX3vsFnLewYZX3x695NfYJ+r1MYHj 8EFZCCU5mfo8o847X/TyBOJqzQtiALWovTzUsIPBtvERZOPG08/4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=w69 fIN0n2pB8bv5ByzC8khMRNzU=; b=Twnz7h5CoHeq4ZL3uWDCINYsUMF170n8IQs ppbXTw8yfKVbJZbW970od3G16iEdfjzg1vKOrsURxGA5GLkBTCMmOS9FqXr2twmO HJ+BtyklsNel3+TtR3kW7pY65aE8WX7r6Cb3Uq4Pv7ul+yRFoSZN68jktrpACE0h 2r9OTxEw= X-Sasl-enc: VATYoLOHU/pudOblwtaTPQcAWZrYMAoDasYLSqsFzqld 1405872243 Received: from akai.skunkwerks.at (unknown [94.136.7.161]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1D733C0000C for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 12:04:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 18:04:03 +0200 From: Dave Cottlehuber To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <7835004.1180.1405810417872.JavaMail.Joan@RITA> Subject: Re: Code of Conduct - any other comments? X-Mailer: Airmail Beta (247) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="53cbe873_19495cff_7da3" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --53cbe873_19495cff_7da3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > On Saturday, 19 July 2014 at 23:53, Joan Touzet wrote: > > > Other than the thread discussing point 2, does anyone have any > > additional concerns or comments about the Code of Conduct draft? > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=41812010 > > > > With one exception, the sense I am getting is that the document is in > > good shape and ready to be voted on once the bylaws are passed. > > > > Best regards, > > Joan > LGTM. Thanks everybody who has contributed. A+ Dave --53cbe873_19495cff_7da3--