Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kxepal@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20140605102332.GB14662@atypical.net>
References: 
 <CAHdjipK4ttN1JDTrCYYAkvktMergJ23BDZSOOUhMFPzVyHydeg@mail.gmail.com>
	<14856062.1528.1401949052991.JavaMail.Joan@RITA>
	<CAJNb-9pNt0jc-=5=His=mP2E_OLw6EAHO+wP7sMH=agYqzy+6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140605102332.GB14662@atypical.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:32:05 +0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAHdjipK4z0-AA7B-cS_Ju_C8OyD8zHbbvBW62FajsWr3Z2Pf-w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [REQUES] Review proposed bylaws (Was: Re: [DISCUSS] Project
 bylaws)
From: Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com>
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Joan Touzet <wohali@apache.org> wrote:
>> A quick note about that but all the discussion in communities about having
>> by-laws and rules have finished by agreeing in a short version of them.
>
> I am -0 on that but -1 on reducing it to a single sentence. If you feel
> strongly about having a shorter version of the bylaws or of the CoC,
> please propose some text.

No need to reduce, just to provide TL;DR version as 500px did. That's
was initial idea (: But I see nobody feels good for it.
We have in anyway provide explanation of good conduct like license
agreements have to provide very detailed explanation of rights and
responsibilities.


--
,,,^..^,,,