couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexander Shorin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2248) Replace "master" and "slave" terminology
Date Tue, 27 May 2014 15:25:02 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14009783#comment-14009783
] 

Alexander Shorin commented on COUCHDB-2248:
-------------------------------------------

If you're going to introduce new term in place of common one ("replica" instead of "slave")
please describe it in glossary (worth to finally establish it in our docs) to remove any confusion
and unclear understanding it meaning. Your actions would have much more weight if you can
provide any references to existed Authoritative sources where the same/similar term is used
in the same/similar context with the same/similar meaning. Please take care about localization
since your proposed replacement may not have direct qualified analogue in other languages
and may only case chain reaction of terminology confusion.

If you're going to refuse from usage some English words in CouchDB docs/posts/papers/stuff,
please setup wiki page as about words to abuse with reasons why and recommended replacements
to help technical communicators avoid them in writing docs, posts, running talks and so on.

> Replace "master" and "slave" terminology
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-2248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2248
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Noah Slater
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Inspired by the comments on this PR:
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/2692
> Summary is: `master` and `slave` are racially charged terms, and it would be good to
avoid them. Django have gone for `primary` and `replica`. But we also have to deal with what
we now call multi-master setups. I propose "peer to peer" as a replacement, or just "peer"
if you're describing one node.
> As far as I can tell, the primary work here is the docs. The wiki and any supporting
material can be updated after.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message