couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andy Wenk <a...@nms.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.5
Date Wed, 07 May 2014 07:34:15 GMT
Robert,

did you exactly follow the instructions at
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure and did you use
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.5/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
for
the tests? I am a bit surprised and would expect, that Garren had the same
error ...

I just wanna make sure you tested the right things :)

Cheers

Andy


On 6 May 2014 22:35, Robert Kowalski <rok@kowalski.gd> wrote:

> System: Erlang R16B03 - OSX 10.9.2
>
> Verify: OK
> Diff: Looks okay for me, but I am not an expert there
> Distcheck: First run failed, rerun of distcheck fixed it
>
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> ../test/etap/075-auth-cache.t                    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed:
> 1)
>   Failed test:  2
>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 19 tests but ran 2.
> Files=51, Tests=1198, 284 wallclock secs ( 0.53 usr  0.11 sys + 94.30 cusr
> 23.84 csys = 118.78 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> make[1]: *** [check] Error 1
> make: *** [distcheck] Error 1
>
>
> Second run : OK,
> Third run (from a fresh untar): OK
>
> Install: OK
> Verify Install in Fauxton:  Success :)
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-05-06 18:07 GMT+02:00 Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com>:
>
> > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Nick North <north.n@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > RC4 was good on Windows for both Erlang R14B04 and R16B02. I'll check
> out
> > > RC5 later today and report back.
> >
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > thanks for good news! RC5 is worth to test with Erlang 17 - is it
> > possible for Windows now?
> >
> > --
> > ,,,^..^,,,
> >
>



-- 
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!

http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de

GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588

https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message