Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of north.n@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.179 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <53A66D26-46C2-4D68-BDE2-E02A148FD200@apache.org>
References: 
 <CAPinO9e0Yt_GiDPgo7tg+iTEJv7fdBjT6BjSXPnp-tWQmu6KfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<AA2107F9-5045-46C5-90F2-9275A0FC2DB4@apache.org>
	<CAGHTdUU853S5tSAcrh_YSwFVqmS=2hZo5aLupN24BTidbaYEPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<53A66D26-46C2-4D68-BDE2-E02A148FD200@apache.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:02:10 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAGHTdUW100pkAOGMO_wriTw8yx2OtLtMr9XRgzz1J53T+urVNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Testing Upgrade to 1.6.x
From: Nick North <north.n@gmail.com>
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113484ca47858e04f80852b0

--001a113484ca47858e04f80852b0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=E2=80=8B1.6.0 RC3 was fine=E2=80=8B - I haven't tried since then though.

Nick


On 27 April 2014 16:27, Robert Samuel Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:

>
> Excellent, so the problem no longer occurs with a clean 1.6.x build?
>
> On 27 Apr 2014, at 14:50, Nick North <north.n@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It does look like the Windows 1.5 problem where, as Robert says, I had
> not
> > cleaned up properly from a previous build.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > On 27 April 2014 00:38, Robert Samuel Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote=
:
> >
> >>
> >> Did you 'make clean' first? This looks like you have a module with the
> old
> >> #changes_args record and other modules with the new one.
> >>
> >> On 26 Apr 2014, at 23:04, Stefan K=C3=B6gl <koeglstefan@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> As I see that 1.6.x is coming along, I've tested upgrading an 1.5 db =
to
> >> the
> >>> current 1.6.x branch (26cff2d51473cbc8c0dfc655b2dbb986493bbcb8).
> >>>
> >>> I've stopped couch, compiled 1.6.x with R15B03 and installed the resu=
lt
> >> on
> >>> an Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS.
> >>>
> >>> The instance always failed with the logging output shown in
> >>>
> >>> https://gist.github.com/stefankoegl/11332148
> >>>
> >>> Is this a bug in the 1.6.x branch, or is my upgrade process somehow
> >> broken?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -- Stefan
> >>
> >>
>
>

--001a113484ca47858e04f80852b0--