Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: "Mutton, James" <jmutton@akamai.com>
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 04:03:32 -0500
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Thread-Index: Ac9e0ucjsMIDdq+8R/ymRTtWceVVrw==
Message-ID: <23DA5EBC-BC50-478C-B717-27629617A6EC@akamai.com>
References: 
 <CAKmKYaB4CV-r9vKT1YinE9jEJqeY7dL_zaKxYRA6KpRtqUPCZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHdjipKKX2Yier6y5Rd6UXpPY1r_VX-Nhuso-GmwbULhS5GV_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <50501D2B-CFC3-4B2D-86CF-77D077722598@apache.org>
 <CADA9kr_fjGkKLjNC-7d+AMrSpSZSU-jzwUvJ82XJAaNHwO4UHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGHTdUUrSjL2qPk4o3Umc=DsQTHqD-vce5a170iD=KZ-7Bs-yA@mail.gmail.com>
 <233934E0-BBA8-4598-902D-5E11A62FEAE3@akamai.com>
 <CAKmKYaA8eaR1aLpqRY0=tT03UYrBXE8hkXNKnSGBAkEZBzhQTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <DCCF5046-2FBD-4E21-9458-DF4A1C47EF34@akamai.com>
 <031BB55E-20D3-40A9-B84F-8B9FCF4997B8@apache.org>
 <62F54174-4B35-4ADD-8A3D-6B307B4DE208@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <62F54174-4B35-4ADD-8A3D-6B307B4DE208@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

well, bummer.  Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/c=
ouch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t .......... Failed 4/16 subtests=20

Test Summary Report
-------------------
/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/c=
ouch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t        (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed=
: 4)
  Failed tests:  9, 12-13, 15
Files=3D7, Tests=3D1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr  0.09 sys + 155.32 c=
usr 13.16 csys =3D 169.38 CPU)
Result: FAIL
make[3]: *** [check] Error 1

Unfortunately, I=92m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for t=
he rest of the week.  I=92ll see if I can maybe look closer at what=92s goi=
ng on locally while on the flight.

</JamesM>

On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:28, Mutton, James <jmutton@akamai.com> wrote:

> It did but others appeared which leads me to suspect my local install of =
erlang, given what it takes to get R14 to build with clang.
>=20
> Failed 4/16 subtests=20
> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src=
/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t        (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Fail=
ed: 4)
>  Failed tests:  9, 11, 13, 15
> Result: FAIL
>=20
> deleted everything and rerunning, lets see if the same tests fail.
>=20
> </JamesM>
>=20
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:17, Robert Samuel Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote=
:
>=20
>> R14B04 should be fine (B02 is certainly not, though) and does have some =
important (but rare) bugfixes over B01. The strong recommendation for R14B0=
1 comes from Cloudant. We run R14B01 and have for years, we trust it to wor=
k (and we trust it to fail in various known ways). I=92m curious to know if=
 the test issue vanishes on B01, though.
>>=20
>> B.
>>=20
>> On 23 Apr 2014, at 08:47, Mutton, James <jmutton@akamai.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> I=92m going back now and running against R14B01 (the usual recommendati=
on) instead of R14B04.  Could be something odd between 01 and 04 and also t=
his error was on OSX 10.9 not linux, so I=92d stop short of saying that all=
 of R14 is borked.
>>>=20
>>> </JamesM>
>>>=20
>>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 0:35, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>=20
>>>> What do we make of these?
>>>>=20
>>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Garren Smith <garren@apache.org> wro=
te:
>>>>> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>>>>>=20
>>>>> 21/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/.=
./share/www/script/test/design_docs.js ... FAIL
>>>>> 26/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/.=
./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js =85 FAIL
>>>>>=20
>>>>> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run ./sha=
re/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times they=
 fail. I=92m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
>>>>=20
>>>> I think the fact that that you "get dist check passing" even though
>>>> some tests fail is pretty worrying. But apparently either no one is
>>>> reproducing these failures or no one is seeing them (since distcheck
>>>> passes anyway)?
>>>>=20
>>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mutton, James <jmutton@akamai.com> w=
rote:
>>>>> R14B04
>>>>> Sigs: OK
>>>>> Hashes: OK
>>>>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t                          (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 =
Failed: 1)
>>>>> Failed test:  27
>>>>> Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>>>>> Files=3D51, Tests=3D1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr  0.11 sys + 1=
39.07 cusr 19.59 csys =3D 159.23 CPU)
>>>>> Result: FAIL
>>>>> Install/Run: OK
>>>>> Verify: OK
>>>>=20
>>>> So this works on R15, R16, but not R14? Isn't this what we fixed since=
 rc.2?
>>>>=20
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>=20
>>>> Dirkjan
>>>=20
>>=20
>=20