couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] merge all the forks
Date Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:56:12 GMT
What about doing a blog post?

On 16 April 2014 15:36, Andy Wenk <andy@nms.de> wrote:
> On 16 April 2014 15:28, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Benoit, if you'd like review, can you put some info together? We can
>> > circulate this on dev@ at first, and then do a blog post, and promote
>> > via social media.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I did many posts during the merge here asking for a review:
>>
>>
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dev%40couchdb.apache.org&q=rcouch+status
>>
>> That should help any dev interested in the review.
>>
>> COUCHDB-1994 can be used to track any review. wohali started some here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994
>>
>> Any information on the rcouch wiki are still valid also:
>>
>> https://wiki.refuge.io/display/RCOUCH/rcouch
>>
>> Hope it helps.
>>
>> - benoit
>>
>>
> in addition one could have a look into this for testing
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40couchdb.apache.org/msg29495.html
>
>
>>  On 6 April 2014 10:22, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi again,
>> > >>
>> > >> Benoit's mentioned that the rcouch import is more or less complete
>> from
>> > >> his perspective. No doubt we'll have some mucking around wrt docs,
>> > fauxton,
>> > >> build etc to sort out, but he feels its ready to go.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > More or less from my perspective is nothing. I would be more interested
>> > to
>> > > see any activity from other developers in reviewing that code instead
>> of
>> > > adding new changes (except fixes) to the current code base. Right now
>> > > neither the couchdb project or me see any benefit in my gift since
>> noone
>> > to
>> > > my knowledge did a real (and public) review it,  started to use it or
>> > even
>> > > considered to start to merge it upstream. Instead of spending all this
>> > time
>> > > for free in cleaning the code I could have just took a long vacation
>> and
>> > > continue to ad improvements on my own, which I did since.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> How are things going in bigcouch?
>> > >>
>> > >> To be clear, we *should* make a decision of this magnitude in a
>> separate
>> > >> VOTE thread, but let's discuss
>> > >> further here and I will try to summarise & shepherd towards a
>> consensus.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > We already have a consensus actually something near a consensus defined
>> > > months ago:
>> > >
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1999
>> > >
>> > > In my perspective, we can probably start to define these milestones.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > - benoit
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Noah Slater
>> > https://twitter.com/nslater
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andy Wenk
> Hamburg - Germany
> RockIt!
>
> http://www.couchdb-buch.de
> http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
>
> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
>
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc



-- 
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater

Mime
View raw message