couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CouchDB Developer Code of Conduct
Date Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:48:17 GMT
Some more links.

Mikeal Rogers pointed me to:

http://nodeirc.info/

Node uses the following CoC for IRC:

http://confcodeofconduct.com/

I like this a lot:

http://blog.izs.me/post/30036893703/policy-on-trolling

On 29 April 2014 22:34, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> Coraline Ada Ehmke (via Twitter) pointed me to this:
>
> https://github.com/bantik/contributor_covenant
>
> On 29 April 2014 17:54, Nick North <north.n@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I prefer the flavour of the Django one. The first point is, "Be welcoming,
>> friendly and patient" which feels to me to be about going out of your way
>> to help people and making a positive effort to be good, and the rest is in
>> the same spirit. The Debian one feels a bit less positive: "be wiling to
>> explain to others", "try to stay on topic" etc. The Django one also gives
>> examples of things you may be doing wrong, which can be helpful. But both
>> are good - I certainly wouldn't vote against something that looked like the
>> Debian one.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>> On 29 April 2014 16:36, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps we ought to take the best bits of both and stick it in a wiki
>>> page where we can collaboratively edit. There are a few things from my
>>> notes that I likely want to add in addition to both.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29 April 2014 16:58, Joan Touzet <joant@atypical.net> wrote:
>>> > Can I ask folks who prefer the Django one to the Debian one specially
>>> > why? Is there something in Django's that's not in Debian's? Is there
>>> stuff
>>> > in the Debian one that people don't like explicitlly?
>>> >
>>> > For me, I agree the Django one is shorter and better formatted, but it
>>> > seemed to cover less ground than the Debian one.
>>> >
>>> > -Joan
>>> >
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: "Nick North" <north.n@gmail.com>
>>> > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 9:30:48 AM
>>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CouchDB Developer Code of Conduct
>>> >
>>> > +1 on the CoC idea. I also like the Django example as a starting point.
>>> And
>>> > definitely +1 on no profanity - plenty of people are offended by it, and
>>> > that in itself should be enough to rule it out. It also adds nothing to
>>> the
>>> > process of communicating ideas to the community.
>>> >
>>> > Nick
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 29 April 2014 13:15, Jason Smith <jason.h.smith@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Mike Rhodes <mike.rhodes@cloudant.com
>>> >> >wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > On 29 April 2014 11:18, Jason Smith <jason.h.smith@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > Rule: No profanity
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Secondly, this is only a suspicion, but I think profanity
(and also
>>> >> cocky
>>> >> > > faux hatred), is a shibboleth indicating manhood and that
we are in
>>> a
>>> >> > > men-only club. It's like a loud fart or belch, or scratching
your
>>> >> groin.
>>> >> > > Men generally curb that behavior in mixed company. It reminds
me of
>>> >> bulls
>>> >> > > locking horns to impress a mate. Maybe F-bombs and the anger
it
>>> stands
>>> >> > for
>>> >> > > are scaring some women away from software. Could be wrong,
though.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > +1 to guidance against profanity, particularly casual. Crassness
is
>>> >> > unpleasant.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > -1 to casual sexism that women don't swear, fart or scratch their
>>> >> crotches.
>>> >> > I know you didn't mean harm, but this trap is too easy to fall
into
>>> and
>>> >> is
>>> >> > relevant here.
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Well anyway I'm glad there's some momentum (if not yet consensus) to
>>> this
>>> >> idea. Thanks.
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Noah Slater
>>> https://twitter.com/nslater
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater



-- 
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater

Mime
View raw message