couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] merge all the forks
Date Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:34:29 GMT
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:

> What about doing a blog post?
>

My time is very limited these days, if anyone want to take the lead on
this, that would be cool.

- benoit



>
> On 16 April 2014 15:36, Andy Wenk <andy@nms.de> wrote:
> > On 16 April 2014 15:28, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Benoit, if you'd like review, can you put some info together? We can
> >> > circulate this on dev@ at first, and then do a blog post, and promote
> >> > via social media.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> I did many posts during the merge here asking for a review:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dev%40couchdb.apache.org&q=rcouch+status
> >>
> >> That should help any dev interested in the review.
> >>
> >> COUCHDB-1994 can be used to track any review. wohali started some here:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994
> >>
> >> Any information on the rcouch wiki are still valid also:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.refuge.io/display/RCOUCH/rcouch
> >>
> >> Hope it helps.
> >>
> >> - benoit
> >>
> >>
> > in addition one could have a look into this for testing
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40couchdb.apache.org/msg29495.html
> >
> >
> >>  On 6 April 2014 10:22, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <
> dch@jsonified.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hi again,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Benoit's mentioned that the rcouch import is more or less complete
> >> from
> >> > >> his perspective. No doubt we'll have some mucking around wrt docs,
> >> > fauxton,
> >> > >> build etc to sort out, but he feels its ready to go.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > > More or less from my perspective is nothing. I would be more
> interested
> >> > to
> >> > > see any activity from other developers in reviewing that code
> instead
> >> of
> >> > > adding new changes (except fixes) to the current code base. Right
> now
> >> > > neither the couchdb project or me see any benefit in my gift since
> >> noone
> >> > to
> >> > > my knowledge did a real (and public) review it,  started to use it
> or
> >> > even
> >> > > considered to start to merge it upstream. Instead of spending all
> this
> >> > time
> >> > > for free in cleaning the code I could have just took a long vacation
> >> and
> >> > > continue to ad improvements on my own, which I did since.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >> How are things going in bigcouch?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> To be clear, we *should* make a decision of this magnitude in
a
> >> separate
> >> > >> VOTE thread, but let's discuss
> >> > >> further here and I will try to summarise & shepherd towards
a
> >> consensus.
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > > We already have a consensus actually something near a consensus
> defined
> >> > > months ago:
> >> > >
> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1999
> >> > >
> >> > > In my perspective, we can probably start to define these milestones.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > - benoit
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Noah Slater
> >> > https://twitter.com/nslater
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andy Wenk
> > Hamburg - Germany
> > RockIt!
> >
> > http://www.couchdb-buch.de
> > http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
> >
> > GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
> >
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message