couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andy Wenk <a...@nms.de>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] merge all the forks
Date Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:36:08 GMT
On 16 April 2014 15:28, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Benoit, if you'd like review, can you put some info together? We can
> > circulate this on dev@ at first, and then do a blog post, and promote
> > via social media.
> >
> >
>
> I did many posts during the merge here asking for a review:
>
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dev%40couchdb.apache.org&q=rcouch+status
>
> That should help any dev interested in the review.
>
> COUCHDB-1994 can be used to track any review. wohali started some here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994
>
> Any information on the rcouch wiki are still valid also:
>
> https://wiki.refuge.io/display/RCOUCH/rcouch
>
> Hope it helps.
>
> - benoit
>
>
in addition one could have a look into this for testing
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40couchdb.apache.org/msg29495.html


>  On 6 April 2014 10:22, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi again,
> > >>
> > >> Benoit's mentioned that the rcouch import is more or less complete
> from
> > >> his perspective. No doubt we'll have some mucking around wrt docs,
> > fauxton,
> > >> build etc to sort out, but he feels its ready to go.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > More or less from my perspective is nothing. I would be more interested
> > to
> > > see any activity from other developers in reviewing that code instead
> of
> > > adding new changes (except fixes) to the current code base. Right now
> > > neither the couchdb project or me see any benefit in my gift since
> noone
> > to
> > > my knowledge did a real (and public) review it,  started to use it or
> > even
> > > considered to start to merge it upstream. Instead of spending all this
> > time
> > > for free in cleaning the code I could have just took a long vacation
> and
> > > continue to ad improvements on my own, which I did since.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> How are things going in bigcouch?
> > >>
> > >> To be clear, we *should* make a decision of this magnitude in a
> separate
> > >> VOTE thread, but let's discuss
> > >> further here and I will try to summarise & shepherd towards a
> consensus.
> > >>
> > >
> > > We already have a consensus actually something near a consensus defined
> > > months ago:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1999
> > >
> > > In my perspective, we can probably start to define these milestones.
> > >
> > >
> > > - benoit
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Noah Slater
> > https://twitter.com/nslater
> >
>



-- 
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!

http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de

GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588

https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message