couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Erlang whitespace standards (was: [POLL])
Date Fri, 04 Apr 2014 20:16:22 GMT
Thus spake Alexander Shorin:
> I just faced another indention case which left out of scope of the vote:
> https://gist.github.com/kxepal/2c09fb5348ead90bea04
> 
> Personally, I'm for 1) variant there.

Considering the Z*Y=X approach and the case statement proposal,
and also http://erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/expressions.html#id77318
which has the official guideline, I would say 3) is probably the best
mapping, wouldn't you?

> Another interesting case is anonymous function:
> https://gist.github.com/kxepal/c5480209af9e93a14155
> 
> I prefer 3) one.

Paul showed an anonymous function example in the follow-up I sent,
see :

https://gist.github.com/davisp/8665dd5ca023b5da8f24#file-indent-erl-L17-L24

but it does not cover multiple guarded variants. 3) seems reasonable
to me but I defer to others....

-Joan

Mime
View raw message