couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Samuel Newson <rnew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Date Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:17:35 GMT
R14B04 should be fine (B02 is certainly not, though) and does have some important (but rare)
bugfixes over B01. The strong recommendation for R14B01 comes from Cloudant. We run R14B01
and have for years, we trust it to work (and we trust it to fail in various known ways). I’m
curious to know if the test issue vanishes on B01, though.

B.

On 23 Apr 2014, at 08:47, Mutton, James <jmutton@akamai.com> wrote:

> I’m going back now and running against R14B01 (the usual recommendation) instead of
R14B04.  Could be something odd between 01 and 04 and also this error was on OSX 10.9 not
linux, so I’d stop short of saying that all of R14 is borked.
> 
> </JamesM>
> 
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 0:35, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> What do we make of these?
>> 
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Garren Smith <garren@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>>> 
>>> 21/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js
... FAIL
>>> 26/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js
… FAIL
>>> 
>>> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js)
sometimes they pass and other times they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
>> 
>> I think the fact that that you "get dist check passing" even though
>> some tests fail is pretty worrying. But apparently either no one is
>> reproducing these failures or no one is seeing them (since distcheck
>> passes anyway)?
>> 
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mutton, James <jmutton@akamai.com> wrote:
>>> R14B04
>>> Sigs: OK
>>> Hashes: OK
>>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t                          (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed:
1)
>>> Failed test:  27
>>> Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr  0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59
csys = 159.23 CPU)
>>> Result: FAIL
>>> Install/Run: OK
>>> Verify: OK
>> 
>> So this works on R15, R16, but not R14? Isn't this what we fixed since rc.2?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Dirkjan
> 


Mime
View raw message