Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-33029-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6EA710E04
	for <apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:54:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 96465 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2014 18:54:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96421 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2014 18:54:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.couchdb.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96410 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2014 18:54:58 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:54:58 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kxepal@gmail.com designates
 209.85.128.181 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.128.181] (HELO mail-ve0-f181.google.com)
 (209.85.128.181)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:54:52 +0000
Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oy12so1587927veb.12
        for <dev@couchdb.apache.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=YEZcRoQ6aoRsUSRmaiF6Cq1Txw5hFDIsaAMVN4R9v9c=;
        b=Iyj9gTYwXEjXsUslLe375I8bHOtR2JRaCz+WRYLFxCl1V+XPJ94uPsf+kqxZfn3RCL
         9etRFqBsNuPPrTju8kemaW2r904L5ggNNxXGnTiGly913M7nW9S2kinqN1qYugPcjt/I
         5Ep+rCJT0zRpWXNOy860gr9j8/v9K5i6Cpc6v9bpBRlfbvZntfx79EQJm1DiVmEBjww0
         waMWpdrctwDFDqrzr0DGGFLqjv3B7o04tX2BZNh3NcGMIDRHAjTNZZnkaGarVHUEk7Xo
         kpZKq1XvTsuDGTTpW03o0g3UHSLkhI+jw8I8nvB5mCbwJTPMNiSXBMtJOagg8rwM0mJZ
         RNQw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.126.107 with SMTP id mx11mr1659700vdb.41.1394736871445;
 Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.246.202 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <etPan.5321fe5b.6b8b4567.1614@akai.jsonified.com>
References: <etPan.5321fe5b.6b8b4567.1614@akai.jsonified.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:54:31 +0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAHdjipLE-8XLkb01U4TYNDBgqTfjjaXcsX9oY2PHkvAsj9iKxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: updated Debian build instructions in new wiki
From: Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com>
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com> wrote:
> Question; should we put these instructions actually into our .rst docs?

+1

--
,,,^..^,,,