Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of north.n@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAL+Y1nuMXRkUP6DTf1eN_+qL9XiKFdacUDSPQGVQGihXpM8_NQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAKmKYaAPN9HKHocwY5zWppJZL52czMJ+-m-8GCqav4hbxU7kkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL+Y1nupBe6TfEE7qkeOSHNA-XTC_azgfZV_tpahK1afj50yEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGHTdUVOT6Qr=x9fRwj5te0st6V3m6EkqZfHSwVgWo41o9Yy2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJNb-9qtgHnFYtuv1pRL8w_EoPW8RQaup1U6Xx1tRT39DdHaZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKmKYaAvrTjFyw2xxAJcMmkukP=ARGEOqNx=6_X-qBDrk8BFKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL+Y1nvHJ0KrJn3zNxQqhp78fgPGNFrAmdFNsq4QUAnGuDFgaw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKmKYaCDZ++ixduHTUE82suwpPFwVPHX67PJiw+RVgEN6v7g1g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKmKYaBpXA5UAOdbr=wXKRCXZJQKHNvwMDjqRZF+Kw=EHdRt=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADA9kr9ETLv3ydCCgwzEPiDXjx6=5T-5k1GH3LxVPpCsSpfGyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHdjipJ5-s2SNdUNt9L3PHOsf14RcWF1PWoCdLEx=GdwawzgBQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPaJBx7KQpCmmvQmzCBZey+ce9UcxTWcAKLTgKrHTOyChC1RqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHdjipK-1q5bVSKGXHZiib9QsDuBbWnPC9xU0LoYeUUYdaWdgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADA9kr-kDSu3Cztas1bhMF9BB1RKwJejBbO9dPSdWgrJW1fqnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5317098A.6020406@posteo.de>
	<CAJNb-9pUZWDLkvpgONxvu1JxzkXvkuMk8++_GgGV8r3=E7nZ8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL+Y1nuMXRkUP6DTf1eN_+qL9XiKFdacUDSPQGVQGihXpM8_NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:51:06 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAGHTdUUZEAkpTuWDzVWg0v1n_xVAccuc-toxvFnK9Rop9boJqg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
From: Nick North <north.n@gmail.com>
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15aec123bda804f4c9854e

--047d7b15aec123bda804f4c9854e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'm up for some (more) debugging to try to track down the large attachments
problem. This is a fairly busy week, but I am free all day Wednesday if
that works. I'm also setting up a local FreeBSD machine to try it out
myself, but Windows Hyper-V is giving some problems.

Nick


On 14 March 2014 18:57, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com> wrote:

> On 14 March 2014 14:53, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Klaus Trainer <klaus_trainer@posteo.de>
> wrote:
> >> On 03/05/2014 11:06 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> >>> * I tested against master 5989bb324a and all tests pass
> >>> * I tested against 1986-fix-ibrowse-infinite-async-timeout b35884580
> >>> and ./test/etap/200-view-group-no-db-leaks.t fails
> >>> * rerun with the last one results also in the same error
> >>> * I tested against 1.6 branch and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
> >>
> >> Does anybody have an idea about what change that is in master but not in
> >> the 1.6 branch could make 04-replication-large-atts.t not fail anymore?
> >>
> >
> >
> > did you figured?
> >
> > Also what is the status of this release?
> >
> > - benoit
>
> FWIW I still get the replication failures on FreeBSD + master, even if
> we sprinkle in the various possible fixes out there.
>
> I'm concerned that there's some underlying issue that is worse on
> FreeBSD but still exists on other platforms -- one of the symptoms is
> an exploding RSS memory set during replication.
>
> If somebody feels like doing some peer debugging next week we might be
> able to track this down.
>
> Worth noting, master works for me fine on OSX but not 1.6.
>
> I propose to the illustrious Release Manager (Long May They Reign) to
> dump the 1.6.x branch unceremoniously & cut a new one from current
> master, assuming Fauxton etc are able to work with this?
>
> A+
> Dave
>

--047d7b15aec123bda804f4c9854e--