Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: andy@nms.de
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHdjipK-1q5bVSKGXHZiib9QsDuBbWnPC9xU0LoYeUUYdaWdgQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAKmKYaAPN9HKHocwY5zWppJZL52czMJ+-m-8GCqav4hbxU7kkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL+Y1nupBe6TfEE7qkeOSHNA-XTC_azgfZV_tpahK1afj50yEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGHTdUVOT6Qr=x9fRwj5te0st6V3m6EkqZfHSwVgWo41o9Yy2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJNb-9qtgHnFYtuv1pRL8w_EoPW8RQaup1U6Xx1tRT39DdHaZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKmKYaAvrTjFyw2xxAJcMmkukP=ARGEOqNx=6_X-qBDrk8BFKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL+Y1nvHJ0KrJn3zNxQqhp78fgPGNFrAmdFNsq4QUAnGuDFgaw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKmKYaCDZ++ixduHTUE82suwpPFwVPHX67PJiw+RVgEN6v7g1g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKmKYaBpXA5UAOdbr=wXKRCXZJQKHNvwMDjqRZF+Kw=EHdRt=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADA9kr9ETLv3ydCCgwzEPiDXjx6=5T-5k1GH3LxVPpCsSpfGyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHdjipJ5-s2SNdUNt9L3PHOsf14RcWF1PWoCdLEx=GdwawzgBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPaJBx7KQpCmmvQmzCBZey+ce9UcxTWcAKLTgKrHTOyChC1RqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHdjipK-1q5bVSKGXHZiib9QsDuBbWnPC9xU0LoYeUUYdaWdgQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Wenk <andy@nms.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:06:05 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CADA9kr-kDSu3Cztas1bhMF9BB1RKwJejBbO9dPSdWgrJW1fqnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113aaa3e0ac56e04f3d92dce

--001a113aaa3e0ac56e04f3d92dce
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

Dirkjan asked me if we are ready for 1.6-rc.2 via IRC. So there is still
the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1986 and I am not
quite sure, what my findings mean for running a next rc. The summary of my
findings are:

* I tested against master 5989bb324a and all tests pass
* I tested against 1986-fix-ibrowse-infinite-async-timeout b35884580
and ./test/etap/200-view-group-no-db-leaks.t fails
* rerun with the last one results also in the same error
* I tested against 1.6 branch and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
* I tested against 1994-merge-rcouch branch and make check fails
* I tested 1.6 with recbuf -define(RECBUF_SIZE, 8192 * 4).
and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
* I tested 1.6 with recbuf -define(RECBUF_SIZE, 8192 * 8). and all tests
pass

Everything has been tested on my Mac Book (OS X 10.9.2) with
Erlang R16B03-1 (erts-5.10.4)

Am I the only person who has these problems? We should finde a solution and
decision if we go for 1.6-rc.2 or not.

Cheers

Andy


On 25 February 2014 15:04, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:

> Wait a moment. I have the numbers!
>
> Will update issue ticket in few hours.
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> > Bumping this. It would be good to get this release out. I don't think
> > FreeBSD 10 support is a blocker. We can address it in a bugfix
> > version. We've waited long enough to get 1.6 out I think.
> >
> > On 17 February 2014 11:57, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Andy Wenk <andy@nms.de> wrote:
> >>> afaik we supported FreeBSD 10 with earlier versions. Droppping the
> support
> >>> with 1.6 (even when it would just be for a short time) is not what we
> >>> should do. As Dave stated, he will not be able to work on a fix until
> >>> March. But maybe Alex can find time to do some work.
> >>
> >> I'm whole on this, but actually out of any ideas why so dramatically
> >> slow and mediating on funcs calls timing for the inspiration.
> >>
> >> --
> >> ,,,^..^,,,
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Noah Slater
> > https://twitter.com/nslater
>


-- 
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!

http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de

GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588

https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc

--001a113aaa3e0ac56e04f3d92dce--