Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 554F9104B7 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2790 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2014 12:07:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 2345 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2014 12:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 2337 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2014 12:07:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:07:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of north.n@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:07:05 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w62so1077042wes.28 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:06:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=8RlRJRgfFEe8267eaX9MJpACDN+DUxlOg8e/owi24bk=; b=V+b/jSBZqcPnQngQLSoK8KWYeyhVCi/aTxa9v/5HzJnQyR1CLpE0+ZYaIf53o5I1KF 9oXr6PdHl5tLtwa5xYrNdXkKScY8dh/Oq0izWM6i7pQ1uSufB5COMnBtQhhcA287q3if wG9ll4Ow7dsfmGEbHpVRZ0d8501FkcnaUvoydsUO3Hi7hjclUCpwrPlhKdxqGnCSlqtn yU/uxgIM+hCogEOz3i1Zab89vHccGDZxWB4CeiqoKSXZk0yBra16o0mg4w7qvCGGFJlN CLHhgslplqB++Ps99qfFkqyePKRO0uRECGrH72XIzomIMLryBNdqEK/cseE6WIFbw6ja TBVg== X-Received: by 10.194.157.41 with SMTP id wj9mr402602wjb.34.1394021202576; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:06:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (cpc3-mort6-2-0-cust209.croy.cable.virginm.net. [77.101.60.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id br10sm10879924wjb.3.2014.03.05.04.06.40 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:06:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1 References: <5317098A.6020406@posteo.de> From: Nick North Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B651) In-Reply-To: <5317098A.6020406@posteo.de> Message-Id: <96BF4CAC-37FC-4318-BEA2-E26B4B7A977A@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:06:40 +0000 To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Not at my PC just now so can't check the exact branch name that speeds up at= tachment parsing, but I think it's 1953. It does seem to make some differenc= e to that test (though it's not a fix), and is in master but I wasn't sure i= f I should merge it to 1.6, so it is not currently there. Nick > On 5 Mar 2014, at 11:24, Klaus Trainer wrote: >=20 >> On 03/05/2014 11:06 AM, Andy Wenk wrote: >> * I tested against master 5989bb324a and all tests pass >> * I tested against 1986-fix-ibrowse-infinite-async-timeout b35884580 >> and ./test/etap/200-view-group-no-db-leaks.t fails >> * rerun with the last one results also in the same error >> * I tested against 1.6 branch and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails >=20 > Does anybody have an idea about what change that is in master but not in > the 1.6 branch could make 04-replication-large-atts.t not fail anymore? >=20