couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick North <nort...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 1.6.0 proposals
Date Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:29:05 GMT
I'm also +1 on cutting a new branch from master.

On the recbuf issue, I'm in favour of option 1. I can't remember - would
that allow us to get rid of the mochiweb RECBUF_SIZE define as well? The
fewer magic numbers, the better.

Nick


On 28 March 2014 14:18, Andy Wenk <andy@nms.de> wrote:

> Dave great summary - thanks. I am +1 on recutting from master
>
>
> On 28 March 2014 15:08, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for summarising this from IRC Dave. Model ASF behaviour. :)
> >
> > I am +1 for re-cutting from master, unless there's some specific
> > technical reason not to do so.
> >
> > On 28 March 2014 14:52, Garren Smith <garren@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I can't comment on what to do w.r.t the socket issue. But I'm +1 for
> > cutting a new branch for 1.6
> > >
> > >
> > > On 28 Mar 2014, at 3:39 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi folks,
> > >>
> > >> In this week's IRC meeting we discussed what's up with 1.6.0. While
> the
> > decision
> > >> rests with the Release Manager djc@ it's worth discussing.
> > >>
> > >> # Blockers
> > >>
> > >> We have 1 blocker,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1986and the
> > >> fix is simply setting the tcp receive buffer size to 32786, or 4x the
> > previous
> > >> value.
> > >>
> > >> Exactly why this is a now a problem and wasn't before is not clear,
> but
> > in
> > >> a couple of weeks of fiddling we've not come up with a better
> solution,
> > and
> > >> nobody's found other issues as a result of it.
> > >>
> > >> In the meeting we put forward 3 options for how to include this fix in
> > the
> > >> source:
> > >>
> > >> 1. uncomment the equivalent line in default.ini
> > >>
> > >>       socket_options = [{recbuf, 262144}, {sndbuf, 262144}, {nodelay,
> > true}]
> > >>
> > >> 2. update the default value directly in /src/mochiweb/internal.hrl
> > >>
> > >>       -define(RECBUF_SIZE, 8192 * 4).
> > >>
> > >> 3. change the specific setting only for the replication tests
> > >>
> > >> This boils down to "have people been seeing this in the real world?"
> > and the
> > >> answer is yes, with pretty severe impact.
> > >>
> > >> Please pick one!
> > >>
> > >> # Patch 1.6.x branch or update to current master
> > >>
> > >> Personally I'm undecided on this, master has 180 further commits , esp
> > >> Fauxton, and also a few other important ones. These could be cherry
> > picked
> > >> but is there any reason not to cut a new 1.6.x off current master
> > instead?
> > >> I've no real view of the actual work involved BTW, so please educate
> me.
> > >>
> > >> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/1.6.x...master
> > >>
> > >> Comments?
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Dave Cottlehuber
> > >> Sent from my PDP11
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Noah Slater
> > https://twitter.com/nslater
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andy Wenk
> Hamburg - Germany
> RockIt!
>
> http://www.couchdb-buch.de
> http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
>
> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
>
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message