couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Klaus Trainer <klaus_trai...@posteo.de>
Subject Re: [POLL] Erlang whitespace standards
Date Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:05:46 GMT
Thanks Joan :)

I had fun answering the questions in the poll!  However, it feels like a
very serious personality test, and now I've got that uneasy feeling of
having revealed things about myself that I should have better kept a secret…


On 03/28/2014 10:11 PM, Joan Touzet wrote:
> Time for everyone's favourite topic: whitespace standards.
> 
> I know many of you are fed up with not being able to auto format in
> your favourite editor and match the CouchDB Erlang coding standards, or
> receiving pull requests that are formatted poorly.
> 
> I'd like to fix that with an appropriate whitespace standard, and
> supplementary plugins for vi and emacs that will just Do The Right Thing
> and let us all stop worrying about whitespace corrections in pull
> requests.
> 
> The basic rules seem to be:
> 
>     * Indent everything 4 spaces (not 2 or 8, and no tabs)
>     * Single blank lines between functions
>     * No blank lines between guarded versions of the
>       same function (e.g. couch_btree.erl#L36-L47)
> 
> but beyond that there is some inconsistency in both the code and in
> discussion with other devs.
> 
> Here's a short poll I threw together in Google Docs. I'd love it if you
> could take 5 minutes to reply to it. Early next week I'll summarize and
> post the results. Once we have agreement we can toss up a super small
> Markdown guide / wiki page / whatever and get started on the emacs/vi
> modifications to support it.
> 
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1b7KcQGgNbSCZVRwLjrUl5Z6C2TBx8X1btlU5fwrNHpg/edit#
> 
> Thanks,
> Joan
> 


Mime
View raw message