Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D7BA10A09 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74076 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2014 10:33:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 73704 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2014 10:33:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 73696 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2014 10:33:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:33:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.45] (HELO mail-qa0-f45.google.com) (209.85.216.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:33:15 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ii20so234552qab.4 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:32:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Cr++XGJ6Klv7SzCGJv1HbE4DYQpYYeeD56im1lxPsfM=; b=Po90L8Goyh67RaXXIq7n+9MFSdJ6KQyCVz0Zuzz5JPJMhNWy4ghsUUN+VaRGJ7Ch1a E8XT3ybg74H39OlXGce7/DmUlDjdtYMF43DwC+rkT4nCXEidPGdw1Ev4tfmSkKqR26YM FEfY34OFJrvkclgF/R9PIrIgbTMTJ1jWPISP1NbjYIJymDmPDscXhM2T5zzNaRwd8H02 naGEqWYmiZucXsfp10S3/FIGm0jmwyyf+WItOCf92AETQdLO6BLnoXQFhGIrOeGXL4yR RykIMdf2gHq9QJWDD/rw+CCoZcIfm+Y9/utEMFCDgEL/StrtU6KnIsx6ogHBOh4T01PO 2E+A== X-Received: by 10.224.89.4 with SMTP id c4mr1125333qam.64.1391596374315; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:32:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.58.195 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 02:32:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7D8BC84B-A490-408D-8CAE-46C174DB0ADE@gmail.com> From: Benoit Chesneau Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:32:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [NOTICE] Create marketing@ lis (Was: Re: Marketing suggestion) To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" , Andreas Wenk Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3d0fc8fdc9904f1a64713 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c3d0fc8fdc9904f1a64713 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Andy Wenk wrote: > On 5 February 2014 11:08, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > > > > I agree. > > > > > > If erlang@ becomes the place where newbie questions about Erlang go > > > ignored, we should can the list. > > > > > > > It's already some months since its creation without much activity. > > > > > > > You requested examples: > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-marketing/ > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-marketing/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy, how about two review dates? Six months, and then 12 months. > > > > > > Let's review *all* lists on these dates. > > > > > > > I don't see these mls having a big traffic.The case of openoffice due to > > its background should be put apart imo but fair enough. > > > > I see you already decided to go on this ml with some others people, so > > there is no reason to continue any discussion on that topic anyway, and I > > will see how i can eventually continue to help on the advocacy side. > > > > - benoit > > > > Benoit, > > I think the approach to start "now" and see how the usage will be in some > months with "all" lists is feasible and easy to go with. Let's then make a > review and decide wether a list should exist further or not. > > This is how I understood it, yes. - benoit --001a11c3d0fc8fdc9904f1a64713--