Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6B8A1022C for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26037 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2014 09:44:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 25999 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2014 09:44:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 25991 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2014 09:44:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:44:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.51] (HELO mail-qa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.216.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:44:44 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f11so1881053qae.24 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 01:44:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=MdmEESBaSvWT0jzSGdk9c0og6l+gABNvgV7II0NYEuc=; b=KYEj/tRHhRkWoRzsC1rT0/FmJWVFsUFsC0HFRTt3iYsVNGpCaQ//M2JFvSrOlWj1C3 7PWdM7mwcjGw44+xlGR3FDIPPvDfnVUlXI7XBxgD4ZvFVpLVBWZwcJ14oCOV2+cV9PEa 4WcG4FsNhshHlfLQ6RGU5rbBMAURlxNoB6MvbbTJi5d7IAAfeqIos6JGTCglnN0+FdWx 5VQUvApF1RcG9T0aGbOrSAqYObmLjn7+bOyysnqtERQ4WYUZSbC/EUiwg10h3p0vMKm5 McxPa29kI0qfoUyWpjCBymFTdU+mrydMDDkKYwdJQ6/CETJliABf1txLtds5+roKjwgw VSGA== X-Received: by 10.224.156.68 with SMTP id v4mr9882243qaw.66.1390470263477; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 01:44:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.58.195 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 01:44:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <06B0A74C-D886-481B-92CC-548B7A05E327@apache.org> From: Benoit Chesneau Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:44:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Git Repository Creation To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158c75a201aca04f0a016a2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0158c75a201aca04f0a016a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Russell Branca wro= te: > The scheduler collapse problems in R15 and R16 are widely known and not > resolved. Frankly, as developers of a database, we should strive to provi= de > end users with the most reliable and best experience, which in my opinion > means we should recommend R14B01. There is not a battle tested, reliable > version of Erlang that has proven to solve the scheduler collapse problem= s, > and until that time, I think it's unwise to remove support for R14. > mmm isn't it addressed in R15B02 and later ? OTP-10033 in R5B02 seems directly related. Possibly improved with OTP-10476 in R15B03. Or you are referring to another issue? Trying to check it. - benoit > > -Russell > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Benoit Chesneau >wrote: > > > Robert, > > > > I understood what you meant. > > > > Imo the best thing would be creating a check list of the things that > > prevent to go to a version greater than R14. Can you share the one you > have > > inside cloudant ? It will help us to reach a consensus also later to ma= ke > > sure we can fix them in next Erlang releases. > > > > This is not that I want absolutely use the latest. If we stand on an ol= d > > and unmaintained release then we should know exactly why and check from > > time to time if we still need to stay on this version. > > > > Thanks! > > > > - benoit > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Robert Samuel Newson < > rnewson@apache.org > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > I could have phrased it better, so I=92ll do so now; > > > > > > R14 is still widely used in production and is very stable. R15 and R1= 6 > > > have known stability problems that affect deployments using NIF=92s t= hat > > can > > > potentially run for longer than a millisecond before returning contro= l > to > > > the scheduler. > > > > > > I am not blackmailing the project but I hope you can understand how I > > feel > > > about your suggestion to remove the ability for Cloudant to continue > > > working after we are making such a large contribution and, further, > > seeking > > > to move our active development to couchdb itself. > > > > > > B. > > > > > > On 22 Jan 2014, at 13:01, Benoit Chesneau wrote= : > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Dave Cottlehuber > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 22 January 2014 13:23, Benoit Chesneau > > wrote: > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Robert Samuel Newson > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Benoit, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Cloudant requires R14 support, it would mean our contribution to > > > couchdb > > > >>>> becomes useless to us and we could not contribute further. > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Are you using blackmail? Is this the position of the Cloudant > > company? > > > >> > > > >> Hi Benoit, > > > >> > > > >> Your comment reads like an ad hominem attack, and I don't think > Bob's > > > >> point, nor Bob, nor Cloudant, deserved that. > > > >> > > > > > > > > My questions stand. The way it is formulated, and that's not the > first > > > > time, is not that clear at all. > > > > > > > > > --089e0158c75a201aca04f0a016a2--