couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Samuel Newson <rnew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Git Repository Creation
Date Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:41:54 GMT
Benoit,

Cloudant requires R14 support, it would mean our contribution to couchdb becomes useless to
us and we could not contribute further.

B.

On 22 Jan 2014, at 11:09, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Robert Samuel Newson <
>>> rnewson@apache.org>wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Definitely need to preserve R14 compatibility, that’s still the most
>>>>> stable recent series (as long as you don’t use R14B02)…
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I disagree. R14 hasn't been updated since more than 2 years, and isn't a
>>>> supported version by the Erlang community, R17 will be out sometimes
>>> during
>>>> the spring. Latest versions added many fixes to SSL, improved the
>>>> scheduling and memory usage, the NIF support and added a lot of
>>>> improvements to the binary API. Also latest stables version of different
>>>> distributions don't have any R14 any more (even RHEL).
>>> 
>>> Well, the latest and stable CentOS 6.5 with EPEL 6.8 suggests me to
>>> install R14 (R14B-04.3.el6), not R15 or R16 and I wouldn't be so sure
>>> for others "stable" distros. Also shouldn't forget about production
>>> environments where R14 is already used for some reasons and upgrade
>>> isn't available.
>>> 
>>> Production environnement that really take care of this aren't upgrading to
>> the latest version as well.... Or they apply some confusing logic. They
>> can't have one's cake and eat it too.
>> 
>> Also see, mochiweb increased the latest requirements of the Erlang version,
>> if we want to use latest changes like the websockets, then we will need to
>> maintain our mochiweb version. How long should we do that? Also it will be
>> worth with Erlang R17 which introduces breaking changes with r14 and
>> initial r15 version. Maintain compatibility with all versions around is
>> starting to be difficult and a time killer.
>> 
>> I don't see why we should limit ourself because some are using an old thing
>> in production. If we follow this path maybe we should also support erlang
>> R11 which is still in production and a requirements in some big telecom
>> companies around. We don't do that.
> 
> No, I agree with theory of evolution, progress and
> elimination-of-the-all-old-outdated-legacy-stuff, but there is still
> some lower bound which still have to preserve. For instance, Riak for
> very latest versions didn't officially supported anything beyond R14
> and still adding support of newest Erlang releases very accurate
> (based on those what I had read on ML / GH) and currently they suggest
> to use R15 instead of R16 (CouchDB does).
> 
> On other hand RabbitMQ provides quite nice solution of this problem:
> you may use older Erlang releases, but some features wouldn't works
> for you.
> http://www.rabbitmq.com/which-erlang.html
> Since we're going to multiple repositories, rebar and completely
> modular architecture, can we made some components optional depending
> on available Erlang release?
> 
> As alternative suggestion we can (and can we?) ship "the right" Erlang
> release with CouchDB and eliminate this issue completely, but I'm not
> sure that this idea will receive any effort...
> 
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,


Mime
View raw message