couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andy Wenk <a...@nms.de>
Subject Re: Next release planning
Date Sun, 08 Dec 2013 16:17:22 GMT
On 6 December 2013 16:17, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On 27 Nov 2013, at 09:37 , Andy Wenk <andy@nms.de> wrote:
>
> > On 26 November 2013 17:10, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This is a nit...maybe...but can we be sure that `_utils/fauxton` and
> >> `_utils/fauxton/` both work? :)
> >>
> >> Would prevent "rock in shoe" sort of frustrations. :)
> >>
> >
> > true :) but that would mean you are not allowed to create a database
> named
> > fauxton which would be requested via _utils/fauxton/
> >
> > This has already been discussed on IRC and the "solution" was imo more or
> > less to wait till fauxton will replace futon. Then you will call it via
> > well known _utils/.
>
> There are no discussions on IRC that are binding. If any of this happens,
> please make sure that dev@ is informed. This is important to ensure
> transparency of the development process/
>

Jan, thanks for pointing me to this.


> I don’t see why `/_utils/fauxton/` would collide with a database called
> `fauxton` as that would live at `/_fauxton`, but I might be missing
> something
> subtle.
>

I don't get the point here. When calling a database called fauxton, the API
call would be sth. like /fauxton/all_docs . Wouldn't that collide with
/fauxton as the Webinterface?

Cheers

Andy

-- 
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!

http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de

GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message