Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:31:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Robert Newson (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12679541.1384566110379.43773.1385638296593@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12679541.1384566110379@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12679541.1384566110379@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1934) jquery.couch status
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13834739#comment-13834739 ] 

Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-1934:
----------------------------------------

Is there a way to make such a deprecation marker visible to the users that call it? My -1 on the mailing list was conditional on hearing "no good reasons to remove it". But, since you've just made some, I'm fine with deprecation ahead of removal, as long as we make some effort to communicate this. A major version bump can do that (to coincide with fauxton replacing futon entirely, except for preserving the unused jquery.couch.js file) but we should do more (tweet, user@ post, etc).

The major version bump will also need to be clearly described as folks will assume it's the bigcouch merge. So, we should clarify our adoption of semver semantics at that time.


> jquery.couch status
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-1934
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1934
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Alexander Shorin
>
> When [~nslater] had proposed to include [jquery.couch.js docs|http://daleharvey.github.io/jquery.couch.js-docs/symbols/] into official CouchDB one I recall old good time when we had discussed Futon.Next project.
> Suddenly, it was out of official mailing lists, so no references are available, but [~garren], [~dch], [~bigbluehat] and [~ryanramage] were there and our discussion was around jquery vs backbone vs pouchdb. Backbone won.
> Nowdays, we have Fauxton which doesn't used jquery.couch and based on Backbone. So it seems if we'll replace Futon with him this client library would be left orphan.
> So that's the question: what is the status of jquery.couch.js? Is it still actual and supported or going to be deprecated?


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)