couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Octavian Damiean <>
Subject Re: couchdb pull request: Handle req.status == 201
Date Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:02:57 GMT
I'm also -1 on removing it. If we really plan to remove it we should do it
gracefully. Add a big note somewhere, maybe even in the header of the
source file notifying users that it will be deprecated.

Maybe even add a or console.warn stating that it is a
deprecated library.

That way people have time to react to it. If we'd just remove it now
because we know it is not used internally we might risk a bad image by
breaking peoples applications.

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Robert Newson <> wrote:

> "where nothing changed,"
> Removing jquery.couch.js will *break* some users. Neither of us know
> how many users that is, or which users it is. The major version bump
> is necessary to communicate this ("MAJOR version when you make
> incompatible API changes"). We can deprecate it without needing to
> bump the major, if that's our decision.
> A big part of semver is to stop being so precious about version
> numbers. It codifies rules for version numbers for the sole intention
> of conveying compatibility. You know that if your code works against
> X.0.0 then it ill also work against X.1.0 and X.0.1. For example, if
> the bigcouch merge didn't change API then we would not bump the major
> for it (but we would bump the minor).
> B.
> On 27 November 2013 12:39, Alexander Shorin <> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Simon Metson <>
> wrote:
> >> If the library is getting taken out to be maintained in an external
> repo why not just maintain it in the asf one? The reason for deprecating it
> would be to be honest that it’s not maintained code, if someone is
> maintaining it then great, keep it in!
> >>
> >> That it’s not used by fauxton is immaterial imho.
> >
> > There are some thoughts about in the related ticket:
> >
> >
> > Deprecated means that it becomes excluded from the CouchDB project.
> > Probably, the word "deprecated" isn't correct one for this case.
> >
> > Personally, I have nothing against jquery.couch and if it will left in
> > main repo it will be fine. But if no part of the project will use it
> > (after fauxton  stable release), it's reasonable to ask what it does
> > in the source tree and wouldn't it be better to move it outside of it?
> > That's all the talks (:
> >
> > --
> > ,,,^..^,,,

Octavian Damiean


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message