Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 343F710A17 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76256 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2013 13:28:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 76227 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2013 13:28:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 76211 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2013 13:28:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:28:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:28:36 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rq2so5290443pbb.6 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:28:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yoUzPDhLEH5CiYAVkpTQSzkC8VoqQEWn5ts0A3zzjjE=; b=Bll4bWo3g5uhqg2VfwYCm0AcLeW+C+d8zL3dbMpT+zyDkIRyzqCXP6B1VsinMalZGA JLYGVlCY8ARjflHGN6iqbfbe0Wu0VeuV1FuCqnla1jYHbTMs68/nuuVnZVxvKIEuT+XG 4PiNw7YTs2QgyMMbMVva2QAPy8C1BH8jre2tCnNPSMYZvUhQH+Uyw6/v9o76vT9uHDAo OD2fVqhct9sk4Cmu8OW5+lOX0NP8ro6rSKeNsloCY3ge20PxeLAw3Y+0bL1iMgdI30H5 MaD7OJry/IUIM7hRPEGI3SjyoRSuv4uGng0B+fklhfGbR/KuU8FKQzwrYSdaxnQDj7/w ubJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.219.167 with SMTP id pp7mr11267558pbc.125.1382880495286; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.59.7 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:28:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [PROPOSAL] tag our commits From: Benoit Chesneau To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3b559cb0400904e9b8f4e1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f3b559cb0400904e9b8f4e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I would like to propose that we start to tag our commits. The reasonning behind that is to distinct easily the changes concerning the doc, the ui and the core and filter them immediately and force us to make a change atomic. So I would like to propose that we tag the commit line with [DOC] [UI] [CORE] other ? Another way to distinct the changes would also be to have all of these as subprojects eventually but it may require too much changes. Thoughts? - benoit --e89a8f3b559cb0400904e9b8f4e1--