couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl>
Subject Re: Releasing experimental features (was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Port _db_updates from rcouch to master)
Date Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:37:56 GMT
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>> X-Couch-API-Stability idea is too complex. Better to have only
>> `X-Couch-Deprecated: true`. Experimental features should be enabled in
>> configs so user takes responsibility for any behavior it provides.
>
> Fair point, happy to have the 1-5 scale in docs only, if we want to
> go that route.

I think the docs part is definitely the most important. We should find
some way to do Sphinx roles for this so we can encode it in a somewhat
reliable way.

Also, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful-01.

>> Also, this information is useless in caps. Caps notifies what server
>> able to do, not how good he can.
>
> Well, if we have comprehensive encoded info on what state everything
> is in, we will also know what we have, which could be used to form
> the capabilities info.

That might be somewhat useful.

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Mime
View raw message