couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [2/3] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 6ad181c
Date Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:22:16 GMT
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Jul 18, 2013, at 16:36 , Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I'm not sure what prompted the urgency of this change but the vote was
> >> aborted until we find a way to generate the new changelog correctly and
> >> keep the old one.
> >>
> >> Note that I quite like to have the changes available on the doc (though
> it
> >> could be duplicated to the root too), so not sure now that it's done
> what
> >> should be done.
> >
> > Okay, sorry for rushing that a bit.
> >
> > I wasn't clear on the timeline for Robert's email about retracting the
> > point for 1.4. From reading the messages again, I don't really
> > understand why we'd want to keep NEWS and CHANGES around. For me as a
> > RM, keeping three places in sync is just a stupid chore, and I'd
> > prefer not to deal with it. If people feel strongly about it, I'll
> > happily re-add NEWS and/or CHANGES with contents populated based on
> > what we accumulate in the docs.
>
> I like the fresh air of not having these :)
>
> What are the concrete problems caused by this change for the 1.4.
> release process other than making sure we convey the desired
> information with other means.
>
> Best
> Jan
> --
>
> well it has been discussed before and aborted. I already said i was +1 on
that. But not sure the NEWS and CHANGES files should be removed now. At
least until we are not clear on how we will fill them later. Which is why
somehow the thread has been aborted.

- benoit

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message