Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPaJBx45cNHLroJu5MqHDxYW5=0t4X9Kvndpq6cdYuPX7NeX6w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51A8C604.3000104@apache.org>
	<CABvT1DHZVvcPdp=RmHERtCMpvBsW1H=bhrisSbhhd+KMd7GyXQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPaJBx43qyB-Hk4K2Pw3VsukW5VypfemxQVSKEcasakDr1ZtMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABvT1DGWpwJ=37_t6X-=mTgZA8AZhXkaeqQ+GE8VhoeGMxCScg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPaJBx45cNHLroJu5MqHDxYW5=0t4X9Kvndpq6cdYuPX7NeX6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:03:38 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABvT1DHhcwkcBdpwEjZ8MvYUz-UFs3iPCHSX=VWuuDyMxvDm_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Update on using git
From: Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Heh, if I felt I could conclude that thread I would have done so
already. We had a reasonably well described approach at one point and
coherency was destroyed by a late appearance of the git-flow
alternative.

B.


On 4 June 2013 18:43, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> This thread is concluded. :) I meant the "[DISCUSS] Git workflow" thread.
>
>
> On 4 June 2013 18:41, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> What's not concluded in this thread?
>>
>> B.
>>
>>
>> On 4 June 2013 18:04, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Bob, are you able to help drive the Git thread to conclusion? We need to
>> > clarify this and document it. Think a lot people are confused right now
>> > since it seems everything is in the air.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 31 May 2013 16:51, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> master, as usual, and the x.y.z branches (for backports). All other
>> >> branches should be feature or fix branches we've not deleted.
>> >>
>> >> B.
>> >>
>> >> On 31 May 2013 16:47, Wendall Cada <wendallc@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > I'm fairly well versed in using git and different workflows, rebase,
>> etc.
>> >> > However, I'm utterly confused as to how I might contribute changes to
>> >> > couchdb, what branches are relevant, etc. Is there documentation for
>> >> this,
>> >> > or a clear summary of decisions made?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Wendall
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > NS
>>
>
>
>
> --
> NS