Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFFACD03E for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 17:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87542 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2013 17:25:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 87499 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2013 17:25:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 87491 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2013 17:25:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 May 2013 17:25:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dch@jsonified.com designates 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.176] (HELO mail-lb0-f176.google.com) (209.85.217.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 May 2013 17:25:28 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x10so4571573lbi.7 for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 10:25:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jsonified.com; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iCSwNjDZX+QFpmgDV2ugy1Vmy30wf41AcaYe0PVjx/Q=; b=WgSg6vmXJOPYMjICF+nuA/n2u0pP61ZEYITpp8wA/sQWLdU0EfiEkPQfCsy9umxTGc n48ef8+FIEggyU7cny48ACaheudNIn0sY37AWnbivdC+honC3jveDQmgy1Poz06bfLGK VMIduXKo5aROsYEElKzlB3RCr67vreiAni67M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=iCSwNjDZX+QFpmgDV2ugy1Vmy30wf41AcaYe0PVjx/Q=; b=ZLyqtNHzJmEk8/uUWr7K5UfGdtW3tue/PxeIrN86DI9Bm6rpZxKvrPUP6beBilIwDh kc5M9lq3lGMgAooaQrwxVZwN6dfANhMJNf8qqqGSIOFDHrPVoX9eZLp2sy8CcEKzR/2A 5tUXWPFfug9LifPyf9zGuzZy9t1NN976eU43h5j3RgmQbTlcXUU9ZyalG86tG9dkWEHM G4QFqiMMvqlzo//1rwK5hmZcMBtkYNEYyQPOXJ2GOKuMVa4nBkpzvlBy/gfXIgeGXbbd zOTtc0ThHnA6eTHabDiSNg0CCLDGDgDf/hh2to/CLcUfuO/JZFB0olu36TsWeNgPBGb+ L6ig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.27.72 with SMTP id r8mr4162057lag.12.1368811506929; Fri, 17 May 2013 10:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.151.7 with HTTP; Fri, 17 May 2013 10:25:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [84.112.19.176] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 19:25:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can we fix or disable Travis CI? From: Dave Cottlehuber To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwXIEvmn/Dvr3J0VhQyz+NWimKDzoIvVg7MtczO3MnEeyEoAKS5WsNdu9PBlZBOb6wosr5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 17 May 2013 18:34, Robert Newson wrote: > So that's a lot better now, except for R16 which we knew.. Did we? Mmm it shouldn't fail on that, did I miss some travis-specific thingummie? A+D