Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91E4CE90D for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 12:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16303 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2013 12:39:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 16117 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2013 12:39:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 16077 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2013 12:39:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 12:39:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of djc.ochtman@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 12:39:27 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id md12so9129178pbc.35 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 05:39:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=A0NeIiWxXUJY8KB01obqMukZBfUd+KFD938FRqzUQ/g=; b=WhxL4HWvt2wG69jxtEVOvg8HRXlXCpP8yYAY7MOy13p0jMFxtMa6lpZMsvVNjcwrUW to61CoNkTmce8kqOEbnZXmJKQ/ZDsLyyFf/ro64tFkXB0jpn118aizZ1Op0yvrriUMmZ U4gBf/SlxgjfonpOARw1kCqHym+oqqWcyDz/6GJONrLTGlDx6bhBp4k2mb7h8I9UciOj tWvz99Yv1SF35NVAvggtBZof8cy5fA15LbCmH9+/FfnvHJB3ciHnWYPkXls7NLLz9lqr xpHHHdoZIUnF5LUyFF+uhI1X8Qxz4Yx7Pg7npj8o8SU1ALtd14vzXgP0eDgAbLOJadOa 98eQ== X-Received: by 10.68.101.226 with SMTP id fj2mr2757282pbb.6.1369831147639; Wed, 29 May 2013 05:39:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: djc.ochtman@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.22.237 with HTTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 05:38:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 14:38:47 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VLJEwfXk3Gs08Ben3pNFEU4SQjw Message-ID: Subject: Re: why pygnents >= 1.5 ? To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > Why do we need pygments >= 1.5 ? I don't see anything in our doc that > would require it. Also the version installed on an ubuntu LTD is 1.4. > > So if there are no reason I think we should decrease the requirements > (or simply removing it). Yeah, I don't see any reason for the 1.5 requirement, either. Looks like Noah came up with that when he integrated the Sphinx stuff in the build system. Cheers, Dirkjan