couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Summary of IRC meeting in #couchdb-meeting, Thu May 8 19:07:14 2013
Date Fri, 10 May 2013 02:43:46 GMT
Thanks for chairing this, Alex! :)


On 8 May 2013 20:45, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:

> Members present: rnewson, Kxepal
>
> ----------------
> Meeting summary:
> ----------------
>
> 1. Preface
> 2. teh merge
>     a. http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@couchdb.apache.org/msg25522.html
> (Kxepal, 19:11:42)
>     b. everyone vote at bigcouch merge tread or/and leave your
> thoughts about there (Kxepal, 19:20:04)
> 3. git discussion
> 4. docs status
>
> ----------------
> Actions:
> ----------------
>
> - everyone vote at bigcouch merge tread or/and leave your thoughts
> about there (Kxepal, 19:20:04)
>
> # 1. Preface #
>
> 19:07:14 [Kxepal]: ASFBot: meeting start
>
> # 2. teh merge #
>
> 19:07:59 [Kxepal]: rnewson, your word about (:
> 19:09:28 [rnewson]: Ah.
> 19:10:00 [rnewson]: I've started a vote thread to get the work into
> our repo. in a few days, assuming no vetoes, we'll being IP clearance
> and then pull the work in.
> 19:10:20 [rnewson]: I encourage +1's but unless you have an objection
> they're quite optional.
> Kxepal: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@couchdb.apache.org/msg25522.html
> 19:12:29 [Kxepal]: rnewson: that's great work!
> 19:12:49 [rnewson]: thanks, most of the work was davisp's.
> 19:14:52 [Kxepal]: you both done much! what will be needed to get it
> into master branch?
> 19:18:42 [Kxepal]: ok, will not force the events, first vote for it (:
> Kxepal: everyone vote at bigcouch merge tread or/and leave your
> thoughts about there
> 19:21:27 [Kxepal]: ok, let's move on
>
> # 3. git discussion #
>
> 19:24:34 [Kxepal]: there was a thread on ml about git workflow:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@couchdb.apache.org/msg25374.html
> 19:25:19 [Kxepal]: I suppose we need summarize ideas and resolutions
> from it in form of some guide in wiki. anyone git-familiar could
> handle this?
> 19:27:37 [rnewson]: I don't believe we reached consensus on that topic yet.
> 19:30:04 [Kxepal]: ah, I see...recently I'd read a bit about
> rebase-vs-merge and there wasn't everything trivial and clear
> 19:31:49 [Kxepal]: anyway, I think intermediate summary may help to
> split things that are clear from opened issues
> 19:32:06 [rnewson]: I think we got close until the suggestion to use
> gitflow with its separate 'release' branch came up.
> 19:32:20 [rnewson]: but this meeting is just a status thing, we're not
> going to resolve that topic here.
> 19:33:21 [Kxepal]: right..ok, than moving on
>
> # 4. docs status #
>
> 19:36:19 [Kxepal]: I had not much done for docs for the last weeks,
> hope to handle things soon and push changes into separate branch for
> reviewing
> 19:37:57 [Kxepal]: ok, looks like May holidays in full swing. let's
> end if nobody else has nothing to say.
>
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>



-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message