couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulling INSTALL.* into the docs
Date Wed, 22 May 2013 08:43:45 GMT


On 22.05.2013, at 10:26, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why not having both? I mean I don't want to have to read an RST to
> know how to install.
> 
> Having plain ascii is good imo. Also this is a common known place to
> find install docs.

We can keep pointers in the existing files as Dirkjan points out. Other than that, .rst is
just as ASCII as .md and I don't think we should worry too much about the minor differences.

Jan
--



> 
> - benoit
> 
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> I think it would make sense to pull our installation documentation
>> into the larger docs effort. To guide people along, we can replace
>> INSTALL.Unix and INSTALL.Windows with an INSTALL file that points to
>> either the reST source and/or the generated HTML files.
>> 
>> Any objections?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Dirkjan

Mime
View raw message