Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJNb-9rqxrfM5hOtxdkFxwwZRta1Ais2bX41xnTaMdSWGcJOjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAL+Y1ns8Bt=H9+EiOL+=qVO3niRx6vw3m2BLCX62HwXEh5k6KA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ_m3YD77gSBD=t6DtnBbsNkjaTo+o=VxG8ZvtQfiq0wgoKQoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL+Y1ntzSnooHE4QE8VdYpHrZfPai_WXCC2_Wb5wo9j8imnQag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJNb-9rqxrfM5hOtxdkFxwwZRta1Ais2bX41xnTaMdSWGcJOjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:42:05 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABvT1DETyu3UVcNyUseSYTd+Kn-EBeKCn1ut065EfFmUFVSGow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: COUCHDB-1696 & deprecating R13B04
From: Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

master, yes.

On 23 April 2013 18:40, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
> master i would say.
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com> wrote:
>> On 9 April 2013 16:55, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm all for bumping our minimum requirement. Reading Bob's commit I'm
>>> not exactly sure which part is requiring a newer Erlang. Maybe one of
>>> the crypto functions is new?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> While digging around in 1696 I found that:
>>>>
>>>> - Bob Ippolito's commit[1] implies only R15B02 and up
>>>> - mochiweb' README[2] mentions testing against < R14A
>>>>
>>>> The changes to keep R13B04 compatibility in CouchDB's mochi fork are not
>>>> huge, but with R16B here is it time to take the plunge and drop R13*
>>>> support?
>>
>> I guess we have lazy consensus on this, but I'm not clear what version
>> / branch this type of dependency change would apply to.
>>
>> 1.3.x? or is this a master/1.4.x thing only?
>>
>> A+
>> Dave